Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Network-Realised Model Predictive Control Part I: NRF-Enabled Closed-loop Decomposition

Andrei Sperilă, Alessio Iovine, Sorin Olaru, Patrick Panciatici

TL;DR

This paper presents a scalable, two-layer control architecture for constraint-based decision-making in networks by leveraging Network Realisation Function (NRF) based controllers in the first layer. The NRF design yields sparse, area-local state-space realizations and fully parameterised closed-loop maps via a tunable Q, enabling offline model-matching to decouple network areas and simplify online supervisory control. A detailed model-matching formulation and solution strategy are provided to achieve desired inter-area decoupling, with a complete numerical demonstration on a 5-node power-grid benchmark illustrating reduced online complexity and robust decoupling performance. The work lays the groundwork for a companion paper that completes the two-layer framework by detailing the second-layer MPC-based constraint management and inter-layer interfacing. Overall, the approach offers a flexible, offline-first decomposition that enhances scalability for distributed MPC-like strategies in large networks.

Abstract

A two-layer control architecture is proposed, which promotes scalable implementations for constraint-based decision strategies, such as model predictive controllers. The bottom layer is based upon a distributed feedback-feedforward scheme, which directs the controlled network's information flow according to a pre-specified communication infrastructure. Explicit expressions for the resulting closed-loop maps are obtained, and an offline model-matching procedure is proposed for designing the first layer. The obtained control laws are deployed via distributed state-space-based implementations, and the resulting closed-loop models enable predictive control design for the constraint management procedure described in our companion paper.

Network-Realised Model Predictive Control Part I: NRF-Enabled Closed-loop Decomposition

TL;DR

This paper presents a scalable, two-layer control architecture for constraint-based decision-making in networks by leveraging Network Realisation Function (NRF) based controllers in the first layer. The NRF design yields sparse, area-local state-space realizations and fully parameterised closed-loop maps via a tunable Q, enabling offline model-matching to decouple network areas and simplify online supervisory control. A detailed model-matching formulation and solution strategy are provided to achieve desired inter-area decoupling, with a complete numerical demonstration on a 5-node power-grid benchmark illustrating reduced online complexity and robust decoupling performance. The work lays the groundwork for a companion paper that completes the two-layer framework by detailing the second-layer MPC-based constraint management and inter-layer interfacing. Overall, the approach offers a flexible, offline-first decomposition that enhances scalability for distributed MPC-like strategies in large networks.

Abstract

A two-layer control architecture is proposed, which promotes scalable implementations for constraint-based decision strategies, such as model predictive controllers. The bottom layer is based upon a distributed feedback-feedforward scheme, which directs the controlled network's information flow according to a pre-specified communication infrastructure. Explicit expressions for the resulting closed-loop maps are obtained, and an offline model-matching procedure is proposed for designing the first layer. The obtained control laws are deployed via distributed state-space-based implementations, and the resulting closed-loop models enable predictive control design for the constraint management procedure described in our companion paper.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 36 sections, 3 theorems, 77 equations, 5 figures, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Proposition 4.1

Let the rows of the TFM from eq:Kd_def be described by the minimal realisations for which we define the polynomials Then, by expressing the aforementioned row TFMs as we have that:

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: High-level implementation scheme depicting the proposed distributed control strategy
  • Figure 2: Feedback loop of a network's model ${\bf G}(z)$ with the NRF-based implementation $\mathbf{K}_{\bf \mathbf{D}}(z)$
  • Figure 3: Implementation scheme for the $i^\text{th}$ area's NRF-based subcontroller
  • Figure 4: The $i^\text{th}$ area's desired closed-loop response, as designated by the choice of TFMs in \ref{['eq:des_d_a']}-\ref{['eq:des_c_d']}.
  • Figure 5: Interconnection topology of the grid's dynamics

Theorems & Definitions (31)

  • Remark 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Remark 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Remark 3.3
  • Remark 3.4
  • Remark 3.5
  • ...and 21 more