Changing the Rules of the Game: Reasoning about Dynamic Phenomena in Multi-Agent Systems
Rustam Galimullin, Maksim Gladyshev, Munyque Mittelmann, Nima Motamed
TL;DR
This work introduces LAMB, a logic for ATL Model Building, to reason about dynamic updates in multi-agent systems by combining hybrid logic features (nominals) with explicit model-modification operators. LAMB extends $\mathsf{ATL}$ via $\mathsf{HATL}$ and supports three primitive updates: valuation changes, edge redirections, and state additions, enabling both verification and synthesis of modular model changes. The authors establish that LAMB strictly extends the expressivity of $\mathsf{HATL}$ and $\mathsf{ATL}$, while maintaining a $PP$-complete model-checking problem; they further analyze bounded synthesis and normative updates, showing practical applicability to mechanism design and normative MAS. The paper also situates LAMB within related work in DEL-inspired updates and rational verification, and outlines avenues for future research, including satisfiability, cost-aware updates, and enhanced expressivity with richer base logics.
Abstract
The design and application of multi-agent systems (MAS) require reasoning about the effects of modifications on their underlying structure. In particular, such changes may impact the satisfaction of system specifications and the strategic abilities of their autonomous components. In this paper, we are concerned with the problem of verifying and synthesising modifications (or updates) of MAS. We propose an extension of the Alternating-Time Temporal Logic ($\mathsf{ATL}$) that enables reasoning about the dynamics of model change, called the Logic for $\mathsf{ATL}$ Model Building ($\mathsf{LAMB}$). We show how $\mathsf{LAMB}$ can express various intuitions and ideas about the dynamics of MAS, from normative updates to mechanism design. As the main technical result, we prove that, while being strictly more expressive than $\mathsf{ATL}$, $\mathsf{LAMB}$ enjoys a P-complete model-checking procedure.
