Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quasi-isometry classification of certain graph $2$-braid groups and its applications

Byung Hee An, Sangrok Oh

TL;DR

This work advances the quasi-isometric classification of graph $2$-braid groups by introducing the intersection complex as a coarse invariant and the framework of bunches of grapes. It proves that, for graphs with circumference $ ext{≤}1$, the $2$-braid groups admit an algorithmic quasi-isometry test via reductions to quasi-minimal representatives, with the intersection complex (and its reduced version) capturing the essential coarse geometry. The paper also develops a suite of graph-operations that preserve quasi-isometry, yielding rigidity results: two $2$-braid groups are quasi-isometric iff their quasi-minimal grape representatives are isometric. Applications include a refined RAAG-dichotomy for graph $2$-braids, a complete quasi-isometric classification of tree $4$-braid groups, and algorithms to decide these quasi-isometry relations, thereby linking configuration-space geometry to RAAGs and tree-gluing phenomena.

Abstract

In \cite{Oh22}, the second author defined a complex of groups decomposition of the fundamental group of a finitely generated 2-dimensional special group, called an \emph{intersection complex}, which is a quasi-isometry invariant. In this paper, using the theory of intersection complexes, we classify the class of 2-braid groups over graphs with circumference $\leq 1$ up to quasi-isometry. Moreover, we find a sufficient condition when such a graph 2-braid group is quasi-isometric to a right-angled Artin group or not. Finally, by applying the same method, we also find that there is an algorithm to determine whether two 4-braid groups over trees are quasi-isometric or not.

Quasi-isometry classification of certain graph $2$-braid groups and its applications

TL;DR

This work advances the quasi-isometric classification of graph -braid groups by introducing the intersection complex as a coarse invariant and the framework of bunches of grapes. It proves that, for graphs with circumference , the -braid groups admit an algorithmic quasi-isometry test via reductions to quasi-minimal representatives, with the intersection complex (and its reduced version) capturing the essential coarse geometry. The paper also develops a suite of graph-operations that preserve quasi-isometry, yielding rigidity results: two -braid groups are quasi-isometric iff their quasi-minimal grape representatives are isometric. Applications include a refined RAAG-dichotomy for graph -braids, a complete quasi-isometric classification of tree -braid groups, and algorithms to decide these quasi-isometry relations, thereby linking configuration-space geometry to RAAGs and tree-gluing phenomena.

Abstract

In \cite{Oh22}, the second author defined a complex of groups decomposition of the fundamental group of a finitely generated 2-dimensional special group, called an \emph{intersection complex}, which is a quasi-isometry invariant. In this paper, using the theory of intersection complexes, we classify the class of 2-braid groups over graphs with circumference up to quasi-isometry. Moreover, we find a sufficient condition when such a graph 2-braid group is quasi-isometric to a right-angled Artin group or not. Finally, by applying the same method, we also find that there is an algorithm to determine whether two 4-braid groups over trees are quasi-isometric or not.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 34 sections, 79 theorems, 95 equations, 23 figures, 4 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 2.7

Let $Y$ be an $n$-dimensional cube complex and let $\Gamma_1,\dots,\Gamma_n$ be 1-dimensional graphs. Then any immersion $\iota:\Gamma_1\times\dots\times\Gamma_n\to Y$ is a local isometry.

Figures (23)

  • Figure 1: Examples of a bunch of graphs and its stem
  • Figure 2: A part of $\overline{*_{i=1}^5\{(\Gamma_i,v_i)\}}$; at each vertex, the small bar indicates the universal cover $\overline{\Gamma}_i$.
  • Figure 3: Free product of graphs as an $m$-ary operation and as a composition of binary operations.
  • Figure 4: Examples of $UD_2(\Gamma)$.
  • Figure 5: An example of graph-of-groups decompositions $\mathcal{G}(\mathbb{B}_2(\Gamma,v))$ and $\mathcal{G}(\pi_1(UP_2(\Gamma,v)))$.
  • ...and 18 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (172)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Example 2.2: Graphs
  • Remark 2.3
  • Example 2.4: Salvetti complex
  • Example 2.5: Discrete $2$-configuration spaces of graphs
  • Lemma 2.7
  • proof
  • Example 2.8: Flats in $\mathop{\mathrm{CAT}}\nolimits(0)$ cube complexes
  • Definition 2.9: HW08Hua(b) (Weakly) special cube complex
  • Theorem 2.10: Hua(b), Theorem 1.3
  • ...and 162 more