Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An extended symmetric union and its Alexander polynomial

Teruaki Kitano, Yasuharu Nakae

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of constructing knot pairs $(K,\hat{K})$ with a meridian-preserving epimorphism $\varphi:G(K)\to G(\hat{K})$ that sends the longitude to the trivial element, extending symmetric unions to include a single full-twisted region. It develops an extended symmetric-union framework in which $\Delta_K(t)=\Delta_{K'}(t)\left(\Delta_{\hat{K}}(t)\right)^2$ and proves a longitude-trivial epimorphism via an explicit $\varphi$, supported by a Conway-polynomial factorization $\nabla_K(z)=\nabla_{N(\tilde{T})}(z)\left(\nabla_{\hat{K}}(z)\right)^2$. The results yield infinite families of Montesinos and 2-bridge knots with $K\geq\hat{K}$ and longitude mapped to the trivial element, including infinitely many non-fibered examples, while providing explicit knots up to 10 crossings and highlighting two exceptions ($10_{82},10_{87}$) not arising from the construction. The work unifies symmetric-union properties with polynomial and group-epimorphism structures, offering a broad, constructive toolkit for understanding when knot groups admit longitude-trivial, meridian-preserving epimorphisms.

Abstract

For prime knots $K_1$ and $K_2$, we write $K_1 \geq K_2$ if there is an epimorphism from the knot group of $K_1$ to that of $K_2$ which preserves the meridian. We construct a family of pairs of knots with $K_1 \geq K_2$ such that an epimorphism maps the longitude of $K_1$ to the trivial element. This construction is regarded as an extension of a symmetric union with a single full twisted region. In particular, it extends a property of the Alexander polynomial of a symmetric union. We also exhibit that all but two of the knots up to ten crossings in the list of Kitano-Suzuki, which have an epimorphism mapping the longitude to the trivial element, arise from this construction.

An extended symmetric union and its Alexander polynomial

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of constructing knot pairs with a meridian-preserving epimorphism that sends the longitude to the trivial element, extending symmetric unions to include a single full-twisted region. It develops an extended symmetric-union framework in which and proves a longitude-trivial epimorphism via an explicit , supported by a Conway-polynomial factorization . The results yield infinite families of Montesinos and 2-bridge knots with and longitude mapped to the trivial element, including infinitely many non-fibered examples, while providing explicit knots up to 10 crossings and highlighting two exceptions () not arising from the construction. The work unifies symmetric-union properties with polynomial and group-epimorphism structures, offering a broad, constructive toolkit for understanding when knot groups admit longitude-trivial, meridian-preserving epimorphisms.

Abstract

For prime knots and , we write if there is an epimorphism from the knot group of to that of which preserves the meridian. We construct a family of pairs of knots with such that an epimorphism maps the longitude of to the trivial element. This construction is regarded as an extension of a symmetric union with a single full twisted region. In particular, it extends a property of the Alexander polynomial of a symmetric union. We also exhibit that all but two of the knots up to ten crossings in the list of Kitano-Suzuki, which have an epimorphism mapping the longitude to the trivial element, arise from this construction.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 7 theorems, 10 equations, 13 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

The knot $K$, constructed as described above, satisfies the following properties.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: the diagram of a knot $K$
  • Figure 2: $K=N(\tilde{T}+T_0)$
  • Figure 3: $L_0$, $L_1$, $L_2$
  • Figure 4: arcs of $D$, $D^\ast$, $T_0$
  • Figure 5: arcs of $D$, $D^\ast$, and $T$, the oriented diagram of $K$
  • ...and 8 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • ...and 4 more