Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Parameterized Study of Secluded Structures in Directed Graphs

Jonas Schmidt, Shaily Verma, Nadym Mallek

TL;DR

This work studies directed variants of the Secluded Π-Subgraph problem, defining In-, Out-, and Total-seclusion and examining their parameterized complexity with respect to k and combined parameters. We prove NP-hardness for Total-Secluded Strongly Connected Subgraph and design an FPT algorithm with runtime $2^{2^{2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2)}}} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ using recursive understanding, balanced separators, and boundary complementations. We further show W[1]-hardness for In/Out-Secluded F-Free Subgraphs under parameter k+w, while providing FPT results for α-bounded and α-bounded subgraphs, and an improved $1.6181^k$ algorithm for Secluded Clique in the undirected setting. To accomplish this, we introduce boundary complementations and a graph-extension compression framework to manage the search space and preserve structure across recursive calls, advancing the algorithmic toolkit for directed secluded subgraph problems.

Abstract

Given an undirected graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the Secluded $Π$-Subgraph problem asks you to find a maximum size induced subgraph that satisfies a property $Π$ and has at most $k$ neighbors in the rest of the graph. This problem has been extensively studied; however, there is no prior study of the problem in directed graphs. This question has been mentioned by Jansen et al. [ISAAC'23]. In this paper, we initiate the study of Secluded Subgraph problem in directed graphs by incorporating different notions of neighborhoods: in-neighborhood, out-neighborhood, and their union. Formally, we call these problems $\{\text{In}, \text{Out}, \text{Total}\}$-Secluded $Π$-Subgraph, where given a directed graph $G$ and integers $k$, we want to find an induced subgraph satisfying $Π$ of maximum size that has at most $k$ in/out/total-neighbors in the rest of the graph, respectively. We investigate the parameterized complexity of these problems for different properties $Π$. In particular, we prove the following parameterized results: - We design an FPT algorithm for the Total-Secluded Strongly Connected Subgraph problem when parameterized by $k$. - We show that the In/Out-Secluded $\mathcal{F}$-Free Subgraph problem with parameter $k+w$ is W[1]-hard, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a family of directed graphs except any subgraph of a star graph whose edges are directed towards the center. This result also implies that In/Out-Secluded DAG is W[1]-hard, unlike the undirected variants of the two problems, which are FPT. - We design an FPT-algorithm for In/Out/Total-Secluded $α$-Bounded Subgraph when parameterized by $k$, where $α$-bounded graphs are a superclass of tournaments. - For undirected graphs, we improve the best-known FPT algorithm for Secluded Clique by providing a faster FPT algorithm that runs in time $1.6181^kn^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$.

A Parameterized Study of Secluded Structures in Directed Graphs

TL;DR

This work studies directed variants of the Secluded Π-Subgraph problem, defining In-, Out-, and Total-seclusion and examining their parameterized complexity with respect to k and combined parameters. We prove NP-hardness for Total-Secluded Strongly Connected Subgraph and design an FPT algorithm with runtime using recursive understanding, balanced separators, and boundary complementations. We further show W[1]-hardness for In/Out-Secluded F-Free Subgraphs under parameter k+w, while providing FPT results for α-bounded and α-bounded subgraphs, and an improved algorithm for Secluded Clique in the undirected setting. To accomplish this, we introduce boundary complementations and a graph-extension compression framework to manage the search space and preserve structure across recursive calls, advancing the algorithmic toolkit for directed secluded subgraph problems.

Abstract

Given an undirected graph and an integer , the Secluded -Subgraph problem asks you to find a maximum size induced subgraph that satisfies a property and has at most neighbors in the rest of the graph. This problem has been extensively studied; however, there is no prior study of the problem in directed graphs. This question has been mentioned by Jansen et al. [ISAAC'23]. In this paper, we initiate the study of Secluded Subgraph problem in directed graphs by incorporating different notions of neighborhoods: in-neighborhood, out-neighborhood, and their union. Formally, we call these problems -Secluded -Subgraph, where given a directed graph and integers , we want to find an induced subgraph satisfying of maximum size that has at most in/out/total-neighbors in the rest of the graph, respectively. We investigate the parameterized complexity of these problems for different properties . In particular, we prove the following parameterized results: - We design an FPT algorithm for the Total-Secluded Strongly Connected Subgraph problem when parameterized by . - We show that the In/Out-Secluded -Free Subgraph problem with parameter is W[1]-hard, where is a family of directed graphs except any subgraph of a star graph whose edges are directed towards the center. This result also implies that In/Out-Secluded DAG is W[1]-hard, unlike the undirected variants of the two problems, which are FPT. - We design an FPT-algorithm for In/Out/Total-Secluded -Bounded Subgraph when parameterized by , where -bounded graphs are a superclass of tournaments. - For undirected graphs, we improve the best-known FPT algorithm for Secluded Clique by providing a faster FPT algorithm that runs in time .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 12 theorems, 3 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Total-Secluded Strongly Connected Subgraph is solvable in time $2^{2^{2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2)}}}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: An illustration of the general recursive understanding algorithm used in \ref{['sec:scc']}. There are two recursive calls in total, highlighted with dashed arrows. As defined later, only vertices inside $B$ are allowed to be in the neighborhood of a solution. $W$ is chosen to be the side of the separation with a smaller intersection with $T$.
  • Figure 3: A visualization of a solution in the original graph and a solution in a boundary complementation. Every partial solution in $U$ can be represented by a boundary complementation.

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Corollary 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Theorem 6
  • Definition 7: Boundary Complementation
  • Lemma 8
  • Definition 9: Separation
  • ...and 7 more