A Coboundary Temperely-Lieb Category for $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-Crystals
Moaaz Alqady, Mateusz Stroiński
TL;DR
This work constructs a diagrammatic framework for $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-crystals by renormalizing the Temperley--Lieb category at $q=0$, producing $\mathcal{TL}_0(\Bbbk)$ which is non-rigid and non-braided but admits a semisimple endomorphism structure and an explicit basis from Temperley--Lieb diagrams. It gives a closed formula for Jones--Wenzl projectors in this setting, and connects endomorphism algebras to contracted monoid algebras via Möbius inversion on finite inverse monoids, providing a rich combinatorial and representation-theoretic description. The main result is a monoidal equivalence between the Cauchy completion $\mathbf{CrysTL}$ and the category of $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-crystals, together with a diagrammatic coboundary structure that yields Henriques–Kamnitzer style commutors and cactus-group actions in a purely diagrammatic setting. The paper also analyzes fiber functors in this non-generic regime, showing non-uniqueness and revealing affine-GIT parameter spaces for these functors, thereby contrasting with the $q\neq 0$ case and highlighting the richer fiber-functor landscape at $q=0$.
Abstract
By considering a suitable renormalization of the Temperley--Lieb category, we study its specialization to the case $q=0$. Unlike the $q\neq 0$ case, the obtained monoidal category, $\mathcal{TL}_0(\Bbbk)$, is not rigid or braided. We provide a closed formula for the Jones--Wenzl projectors in $\mathcal{TL}_0(\Bbbk)$ and give semisimple bases for its endomorphism algebras. We explain how to obtain the same basis using the representation theory of finite inverse monoids, via the associated Möbius inversion. We then describe a coboundary structure on $\mathcal{TL}_0(\Bbbk)$ and show that its idempotent completion is coboundary monoidally equivalent to the category of $\mathfrak{sl}_{2}$-crystals. This gives a diagrammatic description of the commutor for $\mathfrak{sl}_{2}$-crystals defined by Henriques and Kamnitzer and of the resulting action of the cactus group. We also study fiber functors of $\mathcal{TL}_0(\Bbbk)$ and discuss how they differ from the $q\neq 0$ case.
