Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The shadowing property for piecewise monotone interval maps

Adarsh Bura, Chris Good, Tony Samuel

TL;DR

This work addresses whether the shadowing property holds for discontinuous dynamical systems arising from transitive piecewise monotone interval maps and β-transformations. It provides a short, elegant proof that transitive piecewise continuous monotone interval maps do not have finite shadowing, hence no shadowing, by constructing a strategic finite δ-pseudo-orbit near a partition boundary and deriving a contradiction. For β-transformations, it reduces non-transitivity to a transitive first return map that is affine-conjugate to a transitive β-transformation, transferring the non-shadowing conclusion via this conjugacy. The results clarify the limitations of shadowing in these classical intervals maps, contrasting with continuous or subshift-of-finite-type settings, and open avenues for extending the approach to broader piecewise systems and negative β-transformations, with implications for symbolic dynamics and number-theoretic expansions.

Abstract

The property of shadowing has been shown to be fundamental in both the theory of symbolic dynamics as well as continuous dynamical systems. A quintessential class of discontinuous dynamical systems are those driven by transitive piecewise monotone interval maps and in particular $β$-transformations, namely transformations of the form $T_{β, α} : x \mapsto βx + α\; (\operatorname{mod} \, 1)$ acting on $[0,1]$. We provide a short elegant proof showing that this class of dynamical systems does not possess the property of shadowing, complementing and extending the work of Chen and Portela.

The shadowing property for piecewise monotone interval maps

TL;DR

This work addresses whether the shadowing property holds for discontinuous dynamical systems arising from transitive piecewise monotone interval maps and β-transformations. It provides a short, elegant proof that transitive piecewise continuous monotone interval maps do not have finite shadowing, hence no shadowing, by constructing a strategic finite δ-pseudo-orbit near a partition boundary and deriving a contradiction. For β-transformations, it reduces non-transitivity to a transitive first return map that is affine-conjugate to a transitive β-transformation, transferring the non-shadowing conclusion via this conjugacy. The results clarify the limitations of shadowing in these classical intervals maps, contrasting with continuous or subshift-of-finite-type settings, and open avenues for extending the approach to broader piecewise systems and negative β-transformations, with implications for symbolic dynamics and number-theoretic expansions.

Abstract

The property of shadowing has been shown to be fundamental in both the theory of symbolic dynamics as well as continuous dynamical systems. A quintessential class of discontinuous dynamical systems are those driven by transitive piecewise monotone interval maps and in particular -transformations, namely transformations of the form acting on . We provide a short elegant proof showing that this class of dynamical systems does not possess the property of shadowing, complementing and extending the work of Chen and Portela.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 3 theorems, 8 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

If $f$ is a transitive piecewise continuous monotone interval map, then $f$ does not have finite shadowing, and hence, does not have shadowing.

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['thm:Shadowing_Main']}
  • Theorem 3.1: G1990PalmerThesis
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['thm:beta_shadowing']}