Linear-limit aging times of three monoalcohols
Jan Philipp Gabriel, Jeppe C. Dyre, Tina Hecksher
TL;DR
The study addresses whether physical aging in monoalcohols occurs on the timescale of the dielectric $\alpha$ relaxation or the Debye process. By applying single-parameter-aging (SPA), the authors extract the linear-limit aging function $R_{\rm lin}(t)$ from nonlinear temperature-jump data and determine the linear aging time $\tau_R$ via the Laplace transform. For two alcohols with well-separated Debye and $\alpha$ processes (2E1B and 5M2H), $\tau_R$ tracks the temperature dependence of the $\alpha$ relaxation rather than the Debye process; for 1P1P the Debye and $\alpha$ times are too close to allow a firm conclusion. The results suggest distinct origins for Debye cross-correlations in different systems and demonstrate that aging in these hydrogen-bonded liquids is often governed by the $\alpha$ process, with SPA providing a robust bridge from nonlinear aging data to linear-age dynamics.
Abstract
This paper presents data for the physical aging of the three monoalcohols 2-ethyl-1-butanol, 5-methyl-2-hexanol, and 1-phenyl-1-propanol. Aging is studied by monitoring the dielectric loss at a fixed frequency in the kHz range following temperature jumps of a few Kelvin's magnitude, starting from states of equilibrium. The three alcohols differ in the Debye relaxation strength and how much the Debye process is separated from the $α$ process. We first demonstrate that single-parameter aging describes all data well and proceed to utilize this fact to identify the linear-limit normalized aging relaxation functions. From the Laplace transform of these functions, the linear-limit aging loss-peak angular frequency defines the inverse of the linear aging relaxation time. This allows for a comparison to the temperature dependence of the Debye and $α$ dielectric relaxation times of the three monoalcohols. We conclude that the aging response for 5-methyl-2-hexanol and 2-ethyl-1-butanol follows the $α$ relaxation, not the Debye process, while no firm conclusion can be reached for 1-phenyl-1-propanol because its Debye and $α$ processes are too close to be reliably distinguished.
