Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Coincidence of critical points for directed polymers for general environments and random walks

Stefan Junk, Hubert Lacoin

Abstract

For the directed polymer in a random environment (DPRE), two critical inverse-temperatures can be defined. The first one, $β_c$, separates the strong disorder regime (in which the normalized partition function $W^β_n$ tends to zero) from the weak disorder regime (in which $W^β_n$ converges to a nontrivial limit). The other, $\bar β_c$, delimits the very strong disorder regime (in which $W^β_n$ converges to zero exponentially fast). It was proved previously that $β_c=\bar β_c$ when the random environment is upper-bounded for the DPRE based on the simple random walk. We extend this result to general environment and arbitrary reference walk. We also prove that $β_c=0$ if and only the $L^2$-critical point is trivial.

Coincidence of critical points for directed polymers for general environments and random walks

Abstract

For the directed polymer in a random environment (DPRE), two critical inverse-temperatures can be defined. The first one, , separates the strong disorder regime (in which the normalized partition function tends to zero) from the weak disorder regime (in which converges to a nontrivial limit). The other, , delimits the very strong disorder regime (in which converges to zero exponentially fast). It was proved previously that when the random environment is upper-bounded for the DPRE based on the simple random walk. We extend this result to general environment and arbitrary reference walk. We also prove that if and only the -critical point is trivial.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 31 sections, 31 theorems, 226 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

If $\eta>0$, then $\beta_c=\bar{\beta}_c$. Furthermore, if $\beta_c>\beta_2$ then weak disorder holds at $\beta_c$.

Theorems & Definitions (52)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Corollary 2.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • Remark 2.8
  • Theorem 2.9
  • ...and 42 more