Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Separated determinantal point processes and generalized Fock spaces

Giuseppe Lamberti, Xavier Massaneda

TL;DR

The paper establishes a sharp criterion for when the determinantal point process Λ_φ, arising from a generalized Fock space 𝔉_φ with a doubling subharmonic weight φ, is almost surely separated, linking separation to the integrability of 1/ρ^6 over ℂ where ρ(z) encodes Δφ. The authors develop a cell-partition analysis and a key proposition showing that the probability of two points landing in the same cell scales as ρ(z)^{-6}, enabling a Borel–Cantelli dichotomy that yields a precise separation condition and zero upper density when satisfied. They also compare intrinsic repulsion in determinantal processes to a Poisson process with the same first intensity, showing that separation for the Poisson model requires the weaker ρ^{-4} integrability; canonical weights φ_α yield separation iff α<4/3 for Λ_α and α<1 for Λ_α^P, respectively, with implications for interpolating sequences in classical Fock spaces. The results illuminate the balance between repulsion and density and have consequences for interpolation problems in Fock-type spaces and related analytic frameworks.

Abstract

We study conditions so that the determinantal point process $Λ_φ$ associated to a generalized Fock space defined by a doubling subharmonic weight $φ$ is almost surely a separated sequence in $\mathbb C$. Under a natural assumption on $φ$, we provide a characterization of such processes. Additionally, we emphasize the role of intrinsic repulsion in determinantal processes by comparing $Λ_φ$ with the Poisson process of the same first intensity. As an application, we show that the determinantal process $Λ_α$ associated to the canonical weight $φ_α(z)=|z|^α$, $α>0$, is almost surely separated if and only if $α<4/3$. In contrast, the Poisson process $Λ_α^P$ having the same first intensity as $Λ_α$ is almost surely separated if and only if $α<1$.

Separated determinantal point processes and generalized Fock spaces

TL;DR

The paper establishes a sharp criterion for when the determinantal point process Λ_φ, arising from a generalized Fock space 𝔉_φ with a doubling subharmonic weight φ, is almost surely separated, linking separation to the integrability of 1/ρ^6 over ℂ where ρ(z) encodes Δφ. The authors develop a cell-partition analysis and a key proposition showing that the probability of two points landing in the same cell scales as ρ(z)^{-6}, enabling a Borel–Cantelli dichotomy that yields a precise separation condition and zero upper density when satisfied. They also compare intrinsic repulsion in determinantal processes to a Poisson process with the same first intensity, showing that separation for the Poisson model requires the weaker ρ^{-4} integrability; canonical weights φ_α yield separation iff α<4/3 for Λ_α and α<1 for Λ_α^P, respectively, with implications for interpolating sequences in classical Fock spaces. The results illuminate the balance between repulsion and density and have consequences for interpolation problems in Fock-type spaces and related analytic frameworks.

Abstract

We study conditions so that the determinantal point process associated to a generalized Fock space defined by a doubling subharmonic weight is almost surely a separated sequence in . Under a natural assumption on , we provide a characterization of such processes. Additionally, we emphasize the role of intrinsic repulsion in determinantal processes by comparing with the Poisson process of the same first intensity. As an application, we show that the determinantal process associated to the canonical weight , , is almost surely separated if and only if . In contrast, the Poisson process having the same first intensity as is almost surely separated if and only if .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 13 theorems, 109 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Let $\phi$ be a doubling subharmonic function and let $\Lambda_\phi$ be its associated determinantal point process. Then

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Corollary 2.3
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • Corollary 2.6
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • ...and 11 more