Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Minimum degree edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles in random directed graphs

Asaf Ferber, Adva Mond

TL;DR

This work establishes that for the random digraph $D_{n,p}$ with $p\ge \log^{15}n/n$, the maximum number of edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles equals the minimum of the minimum out- and in-degrees, up to polylogarithmic factors, and provides a randomized algorithm achieving this bound. The authors develop a two-phase approach: first, they build a carefully coupled subdigraph $D'$ containing the requisite number of edge-disjoint 1-factors, then they convert these 1-factors into Hamilton cycles via an online sprinkling technique that exposes edges only as needed while maintaining edge-disjointness. Key technical tools include a bijection between digraphs and bipartite graphs, Gale–Ryser type results for factors, and a phase-structured rotation-extension approach adapted to directed graphs. The result yields a near-tight decomposition of $D_{n,p}$ into $\ig(1+o(1)\big)np$ Hamilton cycles, with the edge-exposure managed to fit within $D_{n,p}$ itself. This advances the understanding of Hamiltonian decompositions in random digraphs and introduces robust online randomness methods for constructing large collections of Hamilton cycles.

Abstract

In this paper we consider the problem of finding ``as many edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles as possible'' in the binomial random digraph $D_{n,p}$. We show that a typical $D_{n,p}$ contains precisely the minimum between the minimum out- and in-degrees many edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles, given that $p\geq \log^{15} n/n$, which is optimal up to a factor of poly$\log n$. Our proof provides a randomized algorithm to generate the cycles and uses a novel idea of generating $D_{n,p}$ in a sophisticated way that enables us to control some key properties, and on an ``online sprinkling'' idea as was introduced by Ferber and Vu.

Minimum degree edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles in random directed graphs

TL;DR

This work establishes that for the random digraph with , the maximum number of edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles equals the minimum of the minimum out- and in-degrees, up to polylogarithmic factors, and provides a randomized algorithm achieving this bound. The authors develop a two-phase approach: first, they build a carefully coupled subdigraph containing the requisite number of edge-disjoint 1-factors, then they convert these 1-factors into Hamilton cycles via an online sprinkling technique that exposes edges only as needed while maintaining edge-disjointness. Key technical tools include a bijection between digraphs and bipartite graphs, Gale–Ryser type results for factors, and a phase-structured rotation-extension approach adapted to directed graphs. The result yields a near-tight decomposition of into Hamilton cycles, with the edge-exposure managed to fit within itself. This advances the understanding of Hamiltonian decompositions in random digraphs and introduces robust online randomness methods for constructing large collections of Hamilton cycles.

Abstract

In this paper we consider the problem of finding ``as many edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles as possible'' in the binomial random digraph . We show that a typical contains precisely the minimum between the minimum out- and in-degrees many edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles, given that , which is optimal up to a factor of poly. Our proof provides a randomized algorithm to generate the cycles and uses a novel idea of generating in a sophisticated way that enables us to control some key properties, and on an ``online sprinkling'' idea as was introduced by Ferber and Vu.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 24 sections, 19 theorems, 116 equations, 1 figure, 4 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For $p\geqslant \frac{\log^{15} n}{n}$ with high probability we have

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: A path $P$, left- and right-rotations of it with pivots $(x,y)$ and $(w,z)$, respectively, and a path obtained by rotations from both sides.

Theorems & Definitions (52)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 3.1: Chernoff bound
  • Theorem 3.2: Gale-Ryser
  • Theorem 3.3
  • Lemma 3.4: krivelevich2012optimal
  • Lemma 3.5
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.6
  • proof
  • Claim 3.7
  • ...and 42 more