Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Partitions of an Eulerian Digraph into Circuits

Joshua Cooper, Utku Okur

TL;DR

This work analyzes a cancellation phenomenon for partitions of Eulerian circuits in connected Eulerian digraphs, showing that $\sum_{k\ge 1} (-1)^k f_k(D)=0$ for non-cycle digraphs, via the Martin polynomial's lack of a constant term. It presents an alternative proof using Viennot's Heaps of Pieces, building a bridge from cycle partitions to acyclic orientations and the bond lattice through explicit bijections and decompositions. A key outcome is a direct expression of the Martin polynomial in terms of chromatic polynomials of intersection graphs of cycle partitions, enabling a Möbius-inversion strategy on partition lattices. The cancellation principle then yields a hypergraph-enabled route to the Harary-Sachs theorem for graphs (rank 2), clarifying why only elementary infragraphs contribute in that case and providing a coherent unification with hypergraph theory. The results illuminate deep connections between graph polynomials, lattice theory, and combinatorial decompositions of Eulerian structures, with implications for classical graph theory through the Harary-Sachs framework.

Abstract

We investigate a cancellation property satisfied by a connected Eulerian digraph $D$. Namely, unless $D$ is a single directed cycle, we have $\sum_{k\geq 1} (-1)^{k} f_k(D)=0$, where $f_k(D)$ is the number of partitions of Eulerian circuits of $D$ into $k$ circuits. This property is a consequence of the fact that the Martin polynomial of a digraph has no constant term. We provide an alternative proof by employing Viennot's theory of Heaps of Pieces, and in particular, a bijection between closed trails of a digraph and heaps with a unique maximal piece, which are also in bijection with unique sink orientations of the intersection graphs $G_a$ of partitions $a$ of $E(D)$ into cycles. The argument considers the partition lattice of the edge set of a digraph $D$, restricted to the join-semilattice $T(D)$ induced by elements whose blocks are connected and Eulerian. The minimal elements of $T(D)$ are exactly the partitions of $D$ into cycles, and the up-set of a minimal element $a\in T(D)$ is shown to be isomorphic to the bond lattice $L(G_a)$. Using tools developed by Whitney and Rota, we perform Möbius inversion on $T(D)$ and obtain the claimed cancellation. As a consequence of this alternative proof, we relate the Martin polynomial of a digraph directly to the chromatic polynomials of the intersection graphs of partitions of $D$ into cycles. Finally, we apply the cancellation property in order to deduce the classical Harary-Sachs Theorem for graphs of rank $2$ from a hypergraph generalization thereof, remedying a gap in a previous proof of this.

Partitions of an Eulerian Digraph into Circuits

TL;DR

This work analyzes a cancellation phenomenon for partitions of Eulerian circuits in connected Eulerian digraphs, showing that for non-cycle digraphs, via the Martin polynomial's lack of a constant term. It presents an alternative proof using Viennot's Heaps of Pieces, building a bridge from cycle partitions to acyclic orientations and the bond lattice through explicit bijections and decompositions. A key outcome is a direct expression of the Martin polynomial in terms of chromatic polynomials of intersection graphs of cycle partitions, enabling a Möbius-inversion strategy on partition lattices. The cancellation principle then yields a hypergraph-enabled route to the Harary-Sachs theorem for graphs (rank 2), clarifying why only elementary infragraphs contribute in that case and providing a coherent unification with hypergraph theory. The results illuminate deep connections between graph polynomials, lattice theory, and combinatorial decompositions of Eulerian structures, with implications for classical graph theory through the Harary-Sachs framework.

Abstract

We investigate a cancellation property satisfied by a connected Eulerian digraph . Namely, unless is a single directed cycle, we have , where is the number of partitions of Eulerian circuits of into circuits. This property is a consequence of the fact that the Martin polynomial of a digraph has no constant term. We provide an alternative proof by employing Viennot's theory of Heaps of Pieces, and in particular, a bijection between closed trails of a digraph and heaps with a unique maximal piece, which are also in bijection with unique sink orientations of the intersection graphs of partitions of into cycles. The argument considers the partition lattice of the edge set of a digraph , restricted to the join-semilattice induced by elements whose blocks are connected and Eulerian. The minimal elements of are exactly the partitions of into cycles, and the up-set of a minimal element is shown to be isomorphic to the bond lattice . Using tools developed by Whitney and Rota, we perform Möbius inversion on and obtain the claimed cancellation. As a consequence of this alternative proof, we relate the Martin polynomial of a digraph directly to the chromatic polynomials of the intersection graphs of partitions of into cycles. Finally, we apply the cancellation property in order to deduce the classical Harary-Sachs Theorem for graphs of rank from a hypergraph generalization thereof, remedying a gap in a previous proof of this.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 22 theorems, 80 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Let $( \Omega,\leq )$ be a finite ranked poset. Then, we have for each $a,b\in \Omega$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: The digraph $D$ defined in \ref{['ex:digraph_TD']}.
  • Figure 2: The join-semilattice $T( D )$ induced by partitions into Eulerian digraphs, where $\mathbf{e}$ denotes $e_1 e_2$ for each $e_1,e_2\in E( D )$, and curly brackets are omitted. The numbers are the values $F( b )$, for each element $b\in T( D )$.

Theorems & Definitions (76)

  • Definition 1: Multi-hypergraphs and parallel edges
  • Definition 2: Multi-digraphs and orientations of a multi-graphs
  • Definition 3
  • Definition 4
  • Definition 5
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Definition 6: Partition Lattice
  • ...and 66 more