Fractional anisotropic Calderón problem with external data
Ali Feizmohammadi, Tuhin Ghosh, Katya Krupchyk, Angkana Rüland, Johannes Sjöstrand, Gunther Uhlmann
TL;DR
This work resolves the fractional anisotropic Calderón problem with external data for smooth Riemannian metrics on $\mathbb{R}^n$ that agree with the Euclidean metric outside a compact set, showing that the partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann data determines the metric up to a diffeomorphism fixing the exterior. Two complementary proofs are developed: a heat–semigroup/pseudodifferential approach that leverages Vishik–Eskin estimates to recover the exterior heat kernel and then the metric, and a degenerate elliptic extension approach based on the Caffarelli–Silvestre framework that recasts the problem as a weighted local PDE in the half-space and establishes uniqueness through extension- and energy-based arguments. The paper also clarifies the natural gauge obstruction and provides precise mapping properties for the fractional Laplace–Beltrami operator, including a thorough treatment of exterior Dirichlet problems, Vishik–Eskin estimates, and extension problems. Collectively, the results advance nonlocal inverse problems in noncompact settings, yielding global metric recovery from exterior measurements and enriching the theoretical toolbox with two robust, independent methodologies.
Abstract
In this paper, we solve the fractional anisotropic Calderón problem with external data in the Euclidean space, in dimensions two and higher, for smooth Riemannian metrics that agree with the Euclidean metric outside a compact set. Specifically, we prove that the knowledge of the partial exterior Dirichlet--to--Neumann map for the fractional Laplace-Beltrami operator, given on arbitrary open nonempty sets in the exterior of the domain in the Euclidean space, determines the Riemannian metric up to diffeomorphism, fixing the exterior. We provide two proofs of this result: one relies on the heat semigroup representation of the fractional Laplacian and a pseudodifferential approach, while the other is based on a variable-coefficient elliptic extension interpretation of the fractional Laplacian.
