Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The worst destabilizing 1-parameter subgroup for toric rational curves with one unibranch singularity

Joshua Jackson, David Swinarski

TL;DR

This work analyzes the worst destabilizing 1-parameter subgroup for Chow points of toric rational curves with a single unibranch singularity by translating Geometric Invariant Theory stability into an explicit convex optimization problem. The authors show that the worst 1-PS corresponds to the nearest point on a convex cone W to a strategically defined vector a, with the Hilbert-Mumford function reducible to a simple inner product via a·w, leveraging the secondary (Chow) polytope description. A key result is the persistence phenomenon: for large embedding dimension $N$, the initial segment of the worst-PS weights becomes independent of $N$, while the tail follows a precise linear formula $w_i^* = m i + b$ with $m$ and $b$ given by explicit expressions. The paper combines convex analysis (KKT conditions), combinatorial geometry (Chow/secondary polytopes), and numerical semigroup data to derive explicit descriptions and examples, including higher-order cusps, and outlines future directions towards moduli spaces of unstable curves and extensions to other singularities.

Abstract

Kempf proved that when a point is unstable in the sense of Geometric Invariant Theory, there is a ``worst'' destabilizing 1-parameter subgroup $λ^{*}$. It is natural to ask: what are the worst 1-PS for the unstable points in the GIT problems used to construct the moduli space of curves $\overline{M}_g$? Here we consider Chow points of toric rational curves with one unibranch singular point. We translate the problem as an explicit problem in convex geometry (finding the closest point on a polyhedral cone to a point outside it). We prove that the worst 1-PS has a combinatorial description that persists once the embedding dimension is sufficiently large, and present some examples.

The worst destabilizing 1-parameter subgroup for toric rational curves with one unibranch singularity

TL;DR

This work analyzes the worst destabilizing 1-parameter subgroup for Chow points of toric rational curves with a single unibranch singularity by translating Geometric Invariant Theory stability into an explicit convex optimization problem. The authors show that the worst 1-PS corresponds to the nearest point on a convex cone W to a strategically defined vector a, with the Hilbert-Mumford function reducible to a simple inner product via a·w, leveraging the secondary (Chow) polytope description. A key result is the persistence phenomenon: for large embedding dimension , the initial segment of the worst-PS weights becomes independent of , while the tail follows a precise linear formula with and given by explicit expressions. The paper combines convex analysis (KKT conditions), combinatorial geometry (Chow/secondary polytopes), and numerical semigroup data to derive explicit descriptions and examples, including higher-order cusps, and outlines future directions towards moduli spaces of unstable curves and extensions to other singularities.

Abstract

Kempf proved that when a point is unstable in the sense of Geometric Invariant Theory, there is a ``worst'' destabilizing 1-parameter subgroup . It is natural to ask: what are the worst 1-PS for the unstable points in the GIT problems used to construct the moduli space of curves ? Here we consider Chow points of toric rational curves with one unibranch singular point. We translate the problem as an explicit problem in convex geometry (finding the closest point on a polyhedral cone to a point outside it). We prove that the worst 1-PS has a combinatorial description that persists once the embedding dimension is sufficiently large, and present some examples.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 38 sections, 53 theorems, 250 equations, 4 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 2.3

Suppose that $x \in X$ is unstable for the action of $G$. Then there exists a worst 1-PS for $x$.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: The vector $a$ and the optimal weights $w$ for the Simplified Problem for $\Gamma = \langle 2, 3 \rangle$ and $N=10$
  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (110)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3: MFK*Prop. 2.17, Kempf*Theorem 3.4
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Example 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Lemma 2.10
  • ...and 100 more