Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sharp regularity of sub-Riemannian length-minimizing curves

Alessandro Socionovo

TL;DR

This work investigates the regularity of length-minimizing horizontal curves in a class of sub-Riemannian structures on $\mathbb{R}^3$ defined by $X_1=\partial_{x_1}$ and $X_2=\partial_{x_2}+P(x)^2\partial_{x_3}$ with $P(x)=x_1^a-x_2^b$. The abnormal candidate geodesic $\gamma(t)=(t^b,t^a,0)$ is shown to fail length-minimality for a range of parameter pairs, establishing sharpness of prior results that yielded length-minimizing behavior in other regimes. The authors construct explicit shorter competitors by projecting to $\mathbb{R}^2$ and solving a constrained isoperimetric problem encoded via Stokes theory, balancing a weighted area against a third-coordinate error. These results clarify how the integers $a$ and $b$ govern minimality and regularity, and they point toward deeper structural questions about when $C^2$ regularity can be guaranteed or when truly non-smooth geodesics arise. The approach provides a concrete tool for analyzing abnormal curves and highlights the delicate interplay between analytic and geometric features in sub-Riemannian geometry.

Abstract

A longstanding open question in sub-Riemannian geometry is the smoothness of (the arc-length parameterization of) length-minimizing curves. In [6], this question is negative answered, with an example of a $C^2$ but not $C^3$ length-minimizer of a real-analytic (even polynomial) sub-Riemannian structure. In this paper, we study a class of examples of sub-Riemannian structures that generalizes that presented in [6], and we prove that length-minimizing curves must be at least of class $C^2$ within these examples. In particular, we prove that Theorem 1.1 in [6] is sharp.

Sharp regularity of sub-Riemannian length-minimizing curves

TL;DR

This work investigates the regularity of length-minimizing horizontal curves in a class of sub-Riemannian structures on defined by and with . The abnormal candidate geodesic is shown to fail length-minimality for a range of parameter pairs, establishing sharpness of prior results that yielded length-minimizing behavior in other regimes. The authors construct explicit shorter competitors by projecting to and solving a constrained isoperimetric problem encoded via Stokes theory, balancing a weighted area against a third-coordinate error. These results clarify how the integers and govern minimality and regularity, and they point toward deeper structural questions about when regularity can be guaranteed or when truly non-smooth geodesics arise. The approach provides a concrete tool for analyzing abnormal curves and highlights the delicate interplay between analytic and geometric features in sub-Riemannian geometry.

Abstract

A longstanding open question in sub-Riemannian geometry is the smoothness of (the arc-length parameterization of) length-minimizing curves. In [6], this question is negative answered, with an example of a but not length-minimizer of a real-analytic (even polynomial) sub-Riemannian structure. In this paper, we study a class of examples of sub-Riemannian structures that generalizes that presented in [6], and we prove that length-minimizing curves must be at least of class within these examples. In particular, we prove that Theorem 1.1 in [6] is sharp.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 7 theorems, 45 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

If $a=2$ and $b\geq5$ is odd, then there exists $\varepsilon>0$ such that the curve $\gamma_\varepsilon$ is length-minimizing in $(\mathbb{R}^3,\mathcal{D},g)$. Moreover, the curve $\gamma_\varepsilon$ is non-smooth at 0.

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Proposition 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • proof
  • Definition 2.7
  • ...and 15 more