Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Ultrametric spaces and clouds

I. N. Mikhailov

TL;DR

The paper addresses how to extend the ultrametric construction $\mathbf{U}$ to the full Gromov–Hausdorff landscape, including unbounded spaces, and analyzes how clouds behave under this map. It proves $\mathbf{U}$ is $1$-Lipschitz with respect to $d_{GH}$ in general and that the product mapping $\Psi: X\mapsto X\times A$ with a dotted-connected $A$ preserves $d_{GH}$ and serves as a vehicle for inverting $\mathbf{U}$ on appropriate classes. It further establishes that the class Ult is closed within $[ riangle_1]$ and derives structural consequences: clouds cannot simultaneously host unbounded and dotted-connected spaces, and ultrametric-containing clouds interact with $\mathbf{U}$ in ways that keep $\mathbf{U}([X])$ within $[X]$ in specific cases. These results deepen understanding of unbounded Gromov–Hausdorff geometry and provide tools for stable hierarchical clustering in unbounded settings.

Abstract

In ``Characterization, stability and convergence of hierarchical clustering methods'' by G. E. Carlsson, F. Memoli, the natural way to construct an ultrametric space from a given metric space was presented. It was shown that the corresponding map $\textbf{U}$ is $1$-Lipschitz for every pair of bounded metric spaces, with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. We make a simple observation that $\textbf{U}$ is $1$-Lipschitz for pairs of all, not necessarily bounded, metric spaces. We then study the properties of the mapping $\textbf{U}$. We show that, for a given dotted connected metric space $A$, the mapping $Ψ\colon X\mapsto X\times A$ from the proper class of all bounded ultrametric spaces ($X\times A$ is endowed with the Manhattan metric) preserves the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. Moreover, the mapping $\textbf{U}$ is inverse to $Ψ$. By a dotted connected metric space, we mean a metric space in which for an arbitrary $\varepsilon > 0$ and every two points $p,\,q$, there exist points $x_0 = p,\,x_1,\,\ldots,\,x_n = q$ such that $\max_{0\le j \le n-1}|x_jx_{j+1}|\le \varepsilon$. At the end of the paper, we prove that each class (proper or not) consisting of unbounded metric spaces on finite Gromov-Hausdorff distances from each other cannot contain an ultrametric space and a dotted connected space simultaneously.

Ultrametric spaces and clouds

TL;DR

The paper addresses how to extend the ultrametric construction to the full Gromov–Hausdorff landscape, including unbounded spaces, and analyzes how clouds behave under this map. It proves is -Lipschitz with respect to in general and that the product mapping with a dotted-connected preserves and serves as a vehicle for inverting on appropriate classes. It further establishes that the class Ult is closed within and derives structural consequences: clouds cannot simultaneously host unbounded and dotted-connected spaces, and ultrametric-containing clouds interact with in ways that keep within in specific cases. These results deepen understanding of unbounded Gromov–Hausdorff geometry and provide tools for stable hierarchical clustering in unbounded settings.

Abstract

In ``Characterization, stability and convergence of hierarchical clustering methods'' by G. E. Carlsson, F. Memoli, the natural way to construct an ultrametric space from a given metric space was presented. It was shown that the corresponding map is -Lipschitz for every pair of bounded metric spaces, with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. We make a simple observation that is -Lipschitz for pairs of all, not necessarily bounded, metric spaces. We then study the properties of the mapping . We show that, for a given dotted connected metric space , the mapping from the proper class of all bounded ultrametric spaces ( is endowed with the Manhattan metric) preserves the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. Moreover, the mapping is inverse to . By a dotted connected metric space, we mean a metric space in which for an arbitrary and every two points , there exist points such that . At the end of the paper, we prove that each class (proper or not) consisting of unbounded metric spaces on finite Gromov-Hausdorff distances from each other cannot contain an ultrametric space and a dotted connected space simultaneously.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 12 theorems, 35 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

The Gromov–Hausdorff distance is a generalized pseudometric vanishing on each pair of isometric spaces.

Theorems & Definitions (37)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Claim 2.1: BBI, TuzhilinLectures
  • Definition 2.7
  • Theorem 2.1: BBI
  • Definition 2.8
  • ...and 27 more