Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Core of Approval-Based Committee Elections with Few Seats

Dominik Peters

TL;DR

This work investigates core stability in approval-based multi-winner elections, focusing on whether a core-stable committee always exists. It leverages linear-programming analyses of Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) and introduces a recursive PAV rule to patch PAV outcomes when core objections arise, proving core existence for $k \le 8$ and for $m \le 15$ across all $n$. The results show PAV guarantees a core committee for $k \le 7$ and at least one core committee for $k=8$, while a constructive recursive method certifies core existence for up to $m=15$ candidates; these conclusions are supported by extensive LP-based certificates. The Droop quota variant reveals limits: the core remains challenging to guarantee, with the Droop core failing for even small $k$ (e.g., $k=6$), underscoring open questions about core existence in broader settings. Overall, the paper strengthens confidence in PAV for small-seat elections and provides a computable, certificate-backed approach for larger-but-limited candidate sets, while outlining avenues for further exploration of core existence under alternative quota notions.

Abstract

In an approval-based committee election, the goal is to select a committee consisting of $k$ out of $m$ candidates, based on $n$ voters who each approve an arbitrary number of the candidates. The core of such an election consists of all committees that satisfy a certain stability property which implies proportional representation. In particular, committees in the core cannot be "objected to" by a coalition of voters who is underrepresented. The notion of the core was proposed in 2016, but it has remained an open problem whether it is always non-empty. We prove that core committees always exist when $k \le 8$, for any number of candidates $m$ and any number of voters $n$, by showing that the Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) rule due to Thiele [1895] always satisfies the core when $k \le 7$ and always selects at least one committee in the core when $k = 8$. We also develop an artificial rule based on recursive application of PAV, and use it to show that the core is non-empty whenever there are $m \le 15$ candidates, for any committee size $k \le m$ and any number of voters $n$. These results are obtained with the help of computer search using linear programs.

The Core of Approval-Based Committee Elections with Few Seats

TL;DR

This work investigates core stability in approval-based multi-winner elections, focusing on whether a core-stable committee always exists. It leverages linear-programming analyses of Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) and introduces a recursive PAV rule to patch PAV outcomes when core objections arise, proving core existence for and for across all . The results show PAV guarantees a core committee for and at least one core committee for , while a constructive recursive method certifies core existence for up to candidates; these conclusions are supported by extensive LP-based certificates. The Droop quota variant reveals limits: the core remains challenging to guarantee, with the Droop core failing for even small (e.g., ), underscoring open questions about core existence in broader settings. Overall, the paper strengthens confidence in PAV for small-seat elections and provides a computable, certificate-backed approach for larger-but-limited candidate sets, while outlining avenues for further exploration of core existence under alternative quota notions.

Abstract

In an approval-based committee election, the goal is to select a committee consisting of out of candidates, based on voters who each approve an arbitrary number of the candidates. The core of such an election consists of all committees that satisfy a certain stability property which implies proportional representation. In particular, committees in the core cannot be "objected to" by a coalition of voters who is underrepresented. The notion of the core was proposed in 2016, but it has remained an open problem whether it is always non-empty. We prove that core committees always exist when , for any number of candidates and any number of voters , by showing that the Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) rule due to Thiele [1895] always satisfies the core when and always selects at least one committee in the core when . We also develop an artificial rule based on recursive application of PAV, and use it to show that the core is non-empty whenever there are candidates, for any committee size and any number of voters . These results are obtained with the help of computer search using linear programs.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 7 theorems, 22 equations, 1 table, 2 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 3.1

Let $W$ be a local PAV committee, and let $T$ be a potential deviation. Suppose we have Then $T$ is not a deviation from $W$.

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2: Farkas' Lemma
  • Theorem 4.1
  • proof
  • Remark 4.2
  • Example 4.3: PAV may fail core for $k = 8$
  • Lemma 4.4
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.5
  • ...and 6 more