Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Zeros of symmetric power period polynomials

Robert Dicks, Hui Xue

TL;DR

This work generalizes the classical period polynomial of a newform $f$ by defining the $m$-th symmetric power analogue $R_{m,f}(z)$ using the completed symmetric power $L$-function $L_{m,f}^*(s)$ and its functional equation. The main result proves that all zeros of $R_{m,f}(z)$ lie on the symmetry circle $|z|=1/\sqrt{N}$ in the squarefree level case under either large weight $k$ or large level $N$, with an explicit large-$N$ condition $k>2(\log_2(13e^{2\pi}/9)+m)+1$. The proof reduces the problem to zeros of self-inversive polynomials by constructing auxiliary polynomials $P_{m,f}$, $Q_{m,f}$ (odd $m$) or $p_{m,f}$, $q_{m,f}$ (even $m$) and applying the Lalín–Smyth ElG,R criterion together with Rouché’s theorem to control zeros inside the unit disk, thereby deducing unit-circle zeros for the transformed polynomials. The results extend the $m=1$ case of Ono–Soundararajan and relate to broader questions about the zeros of motivic-like polynomials, with implications for special values of symmetric power $L$-functions and period-type generating functions.

Abstract

Suppose that $k$ and $N$ are positive integers. Let $f$ be a newform on $Γ_0(N)$ of weight $k$ with $L$-function $L_f(s)$. Previous works have studied the zeros of the period polynomial $r_f(z)$, which is a generating function for the critical values of $L_f(s)$ and has a functional equation relating $z$ and $-1/Nz$. In particular, $r_f(z)$ satisfies a version of the Riemann hypothesis: all of its zeros are on the circle of symmetry $\{z \in \C \ : \ |z|=1/\sqrt{N}\}$. In this paper, for a positive integer $m$, we define a natural analogue of $r_f(z)$ for the $m^{\operatorname{th}}$ symmetric power $L$-function of $f$ when $N$ is squarefree. Our analogue also has a functional equation relating $z$ and $-1/Nz$. We prove the corresponding version of the Riemann hypothesis when $k$ is large enough. Moreover, when $k>2(\operatorname{log}_2(13e^{2π}/9)+m)+1$, we prove our result when $N$ is large enough.

Zeros of symmetric power period polynomials

TL;DR

This work generalizes the classical period polynomial of a newform by defining the -th symmetric power analogue using the completed symmetric power -function and its functional equation. The main result proves that all zeros of lie on the symmetry circle in the squarefree level case under either large weight or large level , with an explicit large- condition . The proof reduces the problem to zeros of self-inversive polynomials by constructing auxiliary polynomials , (odd ) or , (even ) and applying the Lalín–Smyth ElG,R criterion together with Rouché’s theorem to control zeros inside the unit disk, thereby deducing unit-circle zeros for the transformed polynomials. The results extend the case of Ono–Soundararajan and relate to broader questions about the zeros of motivic-like polynomials, with implications for special values of symmetric power -functions and period-type generating functions.

Abstract

Suppose that and are positive integers. Let be a newform on of weight with -function . Previous works have studied the zeros of the period polynomial , which is a generating function for the critical values of and has a functional equation relating and . In particular, satisfies a version of the Riemann hypothesis: all of its zeros are on the circle of symmetry . In this paper, for a positive integer , we define a natural analogue of for the symmetric power -function of when is squarefree. Our analogue also has a functional equation relating and . We prove the corresponding version of the Riemann hypothesis when is large enough. Moreover, when , we prove our result when is large enough.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 9 theorems, 48 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose that $k$, $m$ and $N$ are positive integers such that $m>1$ and $N$ is squarefree. Let $f \in S_k(N)$ be a newform. Then $R_{m,f}(z)$ has all of its zeros on the circle $\{z \in \mathbb{C} \ : \ |z|=1/\sqrt{N}\}$ if $k$ is large enough. The result also holds for large enough $N$ if $k>2(\ope

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Remark
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 6 more