Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Equivariant trisections for group actions on four-manifolds

Jeffrey Meier, Evan Scott

TL;DR

This work introduces $G$-equivariant trisections for smooth 4-manifolds with finite group actions and establishes that such trisections, together with $G$-equivariant bridge positions for invariant surfaces, are determined by their spines via shadow diagrams. The authors prove existence (via equivariant triangulations) and show quotient results that encode $X/G$ and the induced diagrams diagrammatically; they develop a rich suite of examples including branched coverings, hyperelliptic involutions, and linear actions from subgroups of $PU(3)$ acting on $P^2$. They classify low-genus equivariant trisections (genus 0–2), showing genus-zero and many genus-one cases are geometric, with explicit models for $D_4$ and $D_6$ actions at genus two. The framework connects 4-manifold equivariant topology to 2-dimensional diagrammatic data, enabling a tractable approach to understanding quotients, branched covers, and symmetry phenomena in familiar manifolds such as $S^4$, $S^2 imes S^2$, and $P^2$, and opens avenues for orbifold trisections and broader group-action classifications.

Abstract

Let $G$ be a finite group, and let $X$ be a smooth, orientable, connected, closed 4-dimensional $G$-manifold. Let $\mathcal{S}$ be a smooth, embedded, $G$-invariant surface in $X$. We introduce the concept of a $G$-equivariant trisection of $X$ and the notion of $G$-equivariant bridge trisected position for $\mathcal{S}$ and establish that any such $X$ admits a $G$-equivariant trisection such that $\mathcal{S}$ is in equivariant bridge trisected position. Our definitions are designed so that $G$-equivariant (bridge) trisections are determined by their spines; hence, the 4-dimensional equivariant topology of a $G$-manifold pair $(X,\mathcal{S})$ can be reduced to the 2-dimensional data of a $G$-equivariant shadow diagram. As an application, we discuss how equivariant trisections can be used to study quotients of $G$-manifolds. We also describe many examples of equivariant trisections, paying special attention to branched covering actions, hyperelliptic involutions, and linear actions on familiar manifolds such as $S^4$, $S^2\times S^2$, and $\mathbb{CP}^2$. We show that equivariant trisections of genus at most one are geometric, and we give a partial classification for genus-two.

Equivariant trisections for group actions on four-manifolds

TL;DR

This work introduces -equivariant trisections for smooth 4-manifolds with finite group actions and establishes that such trisections, together with -equivariant bridge positions for invariant surfaces, are determined by their spines via shadow diagrams. The authors prove existence (via equivariant triangulations) and show quotient results that encode and the induced diagrams diagrammatically; they develop a rich suite of examples including branched coverings, hyperelliptic involutions, and linear actions from subgroups of acting on . They classify low-genus equivariant trisections (genus 0–2), showing genus-zero and many genus-one cases are geometric, with explicit models for and actions at genus two. The framework connects 4-manifold equivariant topology to 2-dimensional diagrammatic data, enabling a tractable approach to understanding quotients, branched covers, and symmetry phenomena in familiar manifolds such as , , and , and opens avenues for orbifold trisections and broader group-action classifications.

Abstract

Let be a finite group, and let be a smooth, orientable, connected, closed 4-dimensional -manifold. Let be a smooth, embedded, -invariant surface in . We introduce the concept of a -equivariant trisection of and the notion of -equivariant bridge trisected position for and establish that any such admits a -equivariant trisection such that is in equivariant bridge trisected position. Our definitions are designed so that -equivariant (bridge) trisections are determined by their spines; hence, the 4-dimensional equivariant topology of a -manifold pair can be reduced to the 2-dimensional data of a -equivariant shadow diagram. As an application, we discuss how equivariant trisections can be used to study quotients of -manifolds. We also describe many examples of equivariant trisections, paying special attention to branched covering actions, hyperelliptic involutions, and linear actions on familiar manifolds such as , , and . We show that equivariant trisections of genus at most one are geometric, and we give a partial classification for genus-two.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 26 sections, 40 theorems, 56 equations, 13 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 3.9

Let $G$ act on a $3$--dimensional $1$--handlebody $H$. A $G$--invariant tangle $\mathcal{T}\subseteq H$ is equivariantly boundary-parallel if and only if it is boundary-parallel.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: Decomposition of tetrahedron into star neighborhoods using the double barycentric subdivision. These figures are derived from the wonderful Wolfram Demonstration by Aleksandr Berdnikov Ber_24_Star-Neighborhoods-in-Double.
  • Figure 2: A schematic illustrating how the $X_i$ are decomposed based on the fundamental pieces $\mathcal{V}$, $\mathcal{E}$, $\mathcal{F}$, and $\mathcal{T}$ at each depth level. The purple segments indicate the location of the linearly parting ball-systems $\mathcal{B}_i$.
  • Figure 3: A schematic illustrating how the $H_i$ (represented as black segments) arise as the intersections of the sectors $X_i$ and $X_{i+1}$, which are decomposed based on the fundamental pieces $\mathcal{V}$, $\mathcal{E}$, $\mathcal{F}$, and $\mathcal{T}$ at each depth level.
  • Figure 4: Diagrams for the link $\mathcal{L}$ and some of its branched covers
  • Figure 5: The branched coverings of the link $\mathcal{L}\subset S^4$ of projective planes corresponding to the representations $\rho\colon\pi_1(S^4\setminus\nu(\mathcal{L}))\to Q_8$
  • ...and 8 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (104)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Definition 3.1
  • Definition 3.2
  • Definition 3.3
  • Definition 3.4
  • Definition 3.5
  • Definition 3.7
  • Definition 3.8
  • Lemma 3.9
  • proof
  • ...and 94 more