I-trustworthy Models. A framework for trustworthiness evaluation of probabilistic classifiers
Ritwik Vashistha, Arya Farahi
TL;DR
The paper addresses reliability beyond accuracy for probabilistic classifiers used in inference tasks by formalizing $\mathcal{I}$-trustworthiness as local calibration on a task-relevant feature space $\mathcal{X}$. It introduces KLCE, a kernelized local calibration error, with an unbiased $\widehat{\mathrm{KLCE}^2}$ estimator and a bootstrap-based p-value for testing $\mathrm{KLCE}=0$, along with a convergence bound. Additionally, it proposes a diagnostic tool via Local Calibration Bias (LCB) to localize biases in $\mathcal{X}$ and demonstrates that conventional recalibration and multicalibration methods often fail to achieve local calibration in real data (e.g., COMPAS, American Housing Survey). The framework provides a principled approach to auditing and improving trustworthiness of probabilistic classifiers in inference tasks, with implications for fairness and regulatory oversight.
Abstract
As probabilistic models continue to permeate various facets of our society and contribute to scientific advancements, it becomes a necessity to go beyond traditional metrics such as predictive accuracy and error rates and assess their trustworthiness. Grounded in the competence-based theory of trust, this work formalizes I-trustworthy framework -- a novel framework for assessing the trustworthiness of probabilistic classifiers for inference tasks by linking local calibration to trustworthiness. To assess I-trustworthiness, we use the local calibration error (LCE) and develop a method of hypothesis-testing. This method utilizes a kernel-based test statistic, Kernel Local Calibration Error (KLCE), to test local calibration of a probabilistic classifier. This study provides theoretical guarantees by offering convergence bounds for an unbiased estimator of KLCE. Additionally, we present a diagnostic tool designed to identify and measure biases in cases of miscalibration. The effectiveness of the proposed test statistic is demonstrated through its application to both simulated and real-world datasets. Finally, LCE of related recalibration methods is studied, and we provide evidence of insufficiency of existing methods to achieve I-trustworthiness.
