Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Pervasiveness of $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$ in $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F^δ)$

Quinn Kiervin Starkey, Foivos Xanthos

TL;DR

This work identifies conditions under which the regular operator space $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$ is pervasive in its completion $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F^{\delta})$, allowing results typically requiring order completeness to be derived from pervasiveness. The authors prove a central result: when $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$ is pervasive in $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F^{\delta})$, the Riesz completion $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)^{\rho}$ can be realized as the Riesz subspace of $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F^{\delta})$ generated by $\mathcal{L}^r(E,i(F))$, and $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$ enjoys the Riesz-Kantorovich property; in addition, $\mathcal{L}^{oc}(E,F)\cap \mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$ forms a band in $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$. The paper further identifies sufficient pervasiveness conditions, notably when $F$ is atomic, and derives explicit band-projection results and convergence characterizations for domains like $E=\ell_0^{\infty}$ or $E=c$. It also shows that $\mathcal{L}^r(E,\ell_0^{\infty})$ always has the Riesz-Kantorovich property, and discusses intricate nuances such as $\mathcal{L}^{oc}(\ell_0^{\infty},F)$ being a band but not necessarily directed, thereby addressing several open problems from prior literature.

Abstract

Let $E, F$ be Archimedean Riesz spaces, and let $F^δ$ denote an order completion of $F$. In this note, we provide necessary conditions under which the space of regular operators $\mathcal{L}^r(E, F)$ is pervasive in $\mathcal{L}^r(E, F^δ)$. Pervasiveness of $\mathcal{L}^r(E, F)$ in $\mathcal{L}^r(E, F^δ)$ implies that the Riesz completion of $ \mathcal{L}^r(E, F)$ can be realized as a Riesz subspace of $ \mathcal{L}^r(E, F^δ$. It also ensures that the regular part of the space of order continuous operators $\mathcal{L}^{oc}(E, F)$ forms a band of $\mathcal{L}^r(E, F)$. Furthermore, the positive part $T^+$ of any operator $T \in \mathcal{L}^r(E, F)$, provided it exists, is given by the Riesz-Kantorovich formula. The results apply in particular to cases where $E = \ell_0^{\infty}$, $E = c$, or $F$ is atomic, and they provide solutions to some problems posed in [3] and [16].

Pervasiveness of $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$ in $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F^δ)$

TL;DR

This work identifies conditions under which the regular operator space is pervasive in its completion , allowing results typically requiring order completeness to be derived from pervasiveness. The authors prove a central result: when is pervasive in , the Riesz completion can be realized as the Riesz subspace of generated by , and enjoys the Riesz-Kantorovich property; in addition, forms a band in . The paper further identifies sufficient pervasiveness conditions, notably when is atomic, and derives explicit band-projection results and convergence characterizations for domains like or . It also shows that always has the Riesz-Kantorovich property, and discusses intricate nuances such as being a band but not necessarily directed, thereby addressing several open problems from prior literature.

Abstract

Let be Archimedean Riesz spaces, and let denote an order completion of . In this note, we provide necessary conditions under which the space of regular operators is pervasive in . Pervasiveness of in implies that the Riesz completion of can be realized as a Riesz subspace of . It also ensures that the regular part of the space of order continuous operators forms a band of . Furthermore, the positive part of any operator , provided it exists, is given by the Riesz-Kantorovich formula. The results apply in particular to cases where , , or is atomic, and they provide solutions to some problems posed in [3] and [16].
Paper Structure (4 sections, 10 theorems, 25 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 10 theorems, 25 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 3.1

Let $\widetilde{F}$ be a Riesz space that is order isomorphic to $F$. Then the spaces $\mathcal{L}^r(E,F)$ and $\mathcal{L}^r(E,\widetilde{F})$ are order isomorphic, moreover we have

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.5
  • proof
  • ...and 11 more