Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Automatic Link Selection in Multi-Channel Multiple Access with Link Failures

Mevan Wijewardena, Michael J. Neely

TL;DR

The goal is to maximize the time average utility, where an arbitrary (possibly nonsmooth) concave and entrywise nondecreasing utility function is considered and various types of fairness, such as proportional fairness, maximizing the minimum, or combinations of these by defining the appropriate utility function are considered.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of automatic link selection in multi-channel multiple access control using bandit feedback. In particular, a controller assigns multiple users to multiple channels in a time slotted system, where in each time slot at most one user can be assigned to a given channel and at most one channel can be assigned to a given user. Given that user $i$ is assigned to channel $j$, the transmission fails with a fixed probability $f_{i,j}$. The failure probabilities are not known to the controller. The assignments are made dynamically using success/failure feedback. The goal is to maximize the time average utility, where we consider an arbitrary (possibly nonsmooth) concave and entrywise nondecreasing utility function. The problem of merely maximizing the total throughput has a solution of always assigning the same user-channel pairs and can be unfair to certain users, particularly when the number of channels is less than the number of users. Instead, our scheme allows various types of fairness, such as proportional fairness, maximizing the minimum, or combinations of these by defining the appropriate utility function. We propose two algorithms for this task. The first algorithm is adaptive and gets within $\mathcal{O}(\log(T)/T^{1/3})$ of optimality over any interval of $T$ consecutive slots over which the success probabilities do not change. The second algorithm has faster $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\log(T)/T})$ performance over the first $T$ slots, but does not adapt well if probabilities change.

Automatic Link Selection in Multi-Channel Multiple Access with Link Failures

TL;DR

The goal is to maximize the time average utility, where an arbitrary (possibly nonsmooth) concave and entrywise nondecreasing utility function is considered and various types of fairness, such as proportional fairness, maximizing the minimum, or combinations of these by defining the appropriate utility function are considered.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of automatic link selection in multi-channel multiple access control using bandit feedback. In particular, a controller assigns multiple users to multiple channels in a time slotted system, where in each time slot at most one user can be assigned to a given channel and at most one channel can be assigned to a given user. Given that user is assigned to channel , the transmission fails with a fixed probability . The failure probabilities are not known to the controller. The assignments are made dynamically using success/failure feedback. The goal is to maximize the time average utility, where we consider an arbitrary (possibly nonsmooth) concave and entrywise nondecreasing utility function. The problem of merely maximizing the total throughput has a solution of always assigning the same user-channel pairs and can be unfair to certain users, particularly when the number of channels is less than the number of users. Instead, our scheme allows various types of fairness, such as proportional fairness, maximizing the minimum, or combinations of these by defining the appropriate utility function. We propose two algorithms for this task. The first algorithm is adaptive and gets within of optimality over any interval of consecutive slots over which the success probabilities do not change. The second algorithm has faster performance over the first slots, but does not adapt well if probabilities change.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 25 theorems, 116 equations, 1 figure, 3 algorithms)

This paper contains 21 sections, 25 theorems, 116 equations, 1 figure, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Consider the following problem. and let $\phi^*$ denote the optimal objective value of the above problem. Then we have $\phi^* = \phi^{\text{opt}}$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Top-Left: Scenario 1. Top-Right: Scenario 2. Bottom-Left: Scenario 3. Bottom-Right: Scenario 4.

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Lemma 4: Push-back
  • Lemma 5
  • proof
  • Lemma 6
  • ...and 39 more