Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Certain results on uniform circle random covering problems

D. Karagulyan

TL;DR

This work extends the uniform random circle covering paradigm to general subsets $A$ of the circle by analyzing when $A$ is contained in the liminf of unions of random arcs with radii $r_n$. The authors introduce a dimension-based threshold $\delta = \liminf_{n\to\infty}(n\ell_n)/\ln n$ and prove a dichotomy: if $\delta < \dim_H(A)$ then $A$ is almost surely not fully covered, with the uncovered portion retaining at least $\dim_H(A)-\delta$ dimensionality; conversely, under a suitable summability condition on $\ell_n$, $A$ is almost surely contained in the uniform random covering. The analysis blends Dvoretzky covering techniques with fractal geometry, yielding explicit thresholds in the common parametrization $\ell_n = c\frac{\ln n}{n}$ and connecting covering properties to both Hausdorff and box-counting dimensions. The results illuminate when uniform random coverings can (and cannot) realize full coverage, and highlight stability limits (e.g., no perturbation-based recovery for $A=\mathbb{T}$) within this probabilistic geometric framework.

Abstract

In this note we extend a theorem from [13] about uniform circle random coverings

Certain results on uniform circle random covering problems

TL;DR

This work extends the uniform random circle covering paradigm to general subsets of the circle by analyzing when is contained in the liminf of unions of random arcs with radii . The authors introduce a dimension-based threshold and prove a dichotomy: if then is almost surely not fully covered, with the uncovered portion retaining at least dimensionality; conversely, under a suitable summability condition on , is almost surely contained in the uniform random covering. The analysis blends Dvoretzky covering techniques with fractal geometry, yielding explicit thresholds in the common parametrization and connecting covering properties to both Hausdorff and box-counting dimensions. The results illuminate when uniform random coverings can (and cannot) realize full coverage, and highlight stability limits (e.g., no perturbation-based recovery for ) within this probabilistic geometric framework.

Abstract

In this note we extend a theorem from [13] about uniform circle random coverings
Paper Structure (4 sections, 5 theorems, 20 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 5 theorems, 20 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $L=\{\ell_n\}$ be a decreasing sequence of positive numbers with $\ell_n\in (0,1)$, and $\{\omega_n\}$ be an i.i.d. sequence uniformly distributed on $\mathbb{T}$.

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 1
  • Corollary 2
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['M1']}-1)
  • Lemma 1.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.2
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Corollary \ref{['cor:covering_fail']}