On strict ranking by pairwise comparisons
Jean-Pierre Magnot
TL;DR
This work investigates how to obtain a strict, tie-free ranking from pairwise comparison matrices used in AHP. It introduces the $\\mathcal{R}$-condition to guarantee a strict ranking and examines how standard consistencization can disrupt this property, even when starting from imperfect data. The authors characterize ranking loci, demonstrate instability under projection-based consistency procedures with 3×3 counterexamples, and propose a new functional $\Phi$ to enforce both consistency and the $\\mathcal{R}$-condition, suggesting a gradient-based optimization pathway. The results provide a framework for generating consistent PC matrices that induce a strict ranking and highlight open questions in the mathematical analysis of the proposed minimization problem with practical implications for decision-making processes relying on PC matrices.
Abstract
We attack the problem of getting a strict ranking (i.e. a ranking without equally ranked items) of $n$ items from a pairwise comparisons matrix. Basic structures are described, a first heuristical approach based on a condition, the $\mathcal{R}-$condition, is proposed. Analyzing the limits of this ranking procedure, we finish with a minimization problem which can be applied to a wider class of pairwise comparisons matrices. If solved, it produces consistent pairwise comparisons that produce a strict ranking.
