Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Learning Primitive Relations for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning

Insu Lee, Jiseob Kim, Kyuhong Shim, Byonghyo Shim

TL;DR

This work tackles Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (CZSL), where models must recognize unseen state–object pairs. It introduces Learning Primitive Relations (LPR), a cross-attention–based framework with three branches (com, sor, osr) that probabilistically model state–object relationships to infer unseen compositions. By leveraging CLIP features and adapters, LPR achieves state-of-the-art results on MIT-States, UT-Zappos, and C-GQA in both closed-world and open-world CZSL, with ablations confirming the benefit of the triple-branch design. Overall, the approach advances compositional generalization by moving beyond independent prediction of states and objects to relational reasoning between primitives, with practical impact for robust zero-shot generalization in vision-language tasks.

Abstract

Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (CZSL) aims to identify unseen state-object compositions by leveraging knowledge learned from seen compositions. Existing approaches often independently predict states and objects, overlooking their relationships. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, learning primitive relations (LPR), designed to probabilistically capture the relationships between states and objects. By employing the cross-attention mechanism, LPR considers the dependencies between states and objects, enabling the model to infer the likelihood of unseen compositions. Experimental results demonstrate that LPR outperforms state-of-the-art methods on all three CZSL benchmark datasets in both closed-world and open-world settings. Through qualitative analysis, we show that LPR leverages state-object relationships for unseen composition prediction.

Learning Primitive Relations for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning

TL;DR

This work tackles Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (CZSL), where models must recognize unseen state–object pairs. It introduces Learning Primitive Relations (LPR), a cross-attention–based framework with three branches (com, sor, osr) that probabilistically model state–object relationships to infer unseen compositions. By leveraging CLIP features and adapters, LPR achieves state-of-the-art results on MIT-States, UT-Zappos, and C-GQA in both closed-world and open-world CZSL, with ablations confirming the benefit of the triple-branch design. Overall, the approach advances compositional generalization by moving beyond independent prediction of states and objects to relational reasoning between primitives, with practical impact for robust zero-shot generalization in vision-language tasks.

Abstract

Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (CZSL) aims to identify unseen state-object compositions by leveraging knowledge learned from seen compositions. Existing approaches often independently predict states and objects, overlooking their relationships. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, learning primitive relations (LPR), designed to probabilistically capture the relationships between states and objects. By employing the cross-attention mechanism, LPR considers the dependencies between states and objects, enabling the model to infer the likelihood of unseen compositions. Experimental results demonstrate that LPR outperforms state-of-the-art methods on all three CZSL benchmark datasets in both closed-world and open-world settings. Through qualitative analysis, we show that LPR leverages state-object relationships for unseen composition prediction.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 2 equations, 5 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 14 sections, 2 equations, 5 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of the conventional and proposed CZSL approaches. While the conventional methods assume independence between states and objects, the proposed LPR learns probabilistic relationships between primitives.
  • Figure 2: Overview of the proposed LPR. LPR consists of three branches, namely compositional (cyan, com), state object relation (purple, sor), and object state relation (yellow, osr) branch. Best viewed in color.
  • Figure 3: Architecture of the state object relation (sor) branch.
  • Figure 4: Effect of $\alpha$ during inference on MIT-States in the open-world setting.
  • Figure 5: Composition classification results from the three different branches. 'Prediction' indicates the final results. Green and red words indicate correct and incorrect predictions, respectively.