Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Generalized cell maps

Carlos Islas, Benjamín A. Itzá Ortiz, Rocío Leonel

TL;DR

The paper extends the notion of cell maps to generalized cell structures (g-cell structures), enabling a broader class of spaces to be realized as quotients of inverse limits. It defines weak g-cell maps and g-cell maps, analyzes when maps between inverse limits induce continuous maps on quotient spaces $G^{igstar}$ and $H^{igstar}$, and provides both existence results and continuity criteria. A key contribution is showing how cell maps induce weak g-cell maps and how g-cell maps yield corresponding induced maps on quotients, along with constructive methods to realize a given continuous $F:G^{igstar} o H^{igstar}$ as $ighat{f}$ under additional hypotheses. The work also clarifies limitations by presenting examples where continuity fails to lift from quotients or from set-valued maps, thereby mapping the boundary between discrete and non-discrete settings in generalized cellular frameworks. Overall, this extends representability and continuity transfer in inverse-limit constructions to a wider, non-discrete context with practical implications for topology and related areas.

Abstract

In [6] the notion of a g-cell structure was introduced as a generalization of the construction proposed by Debski and Tymchatyn to realize a certain class of topological spaces as quotient spaces of inverse limits. In [2], cell maps are defined between cell structures and showed that a cell map between two complete cell structures induces a continuous function between the spaces determined by the cell structures. In this paper, for g-cell structures, we introduce the notions of weak g-cell maps and g-cell maps. We give some conditions for weak g-cell and g-cell mappings between g-cell structures to induce continuous mappings between their corresponding spaces.

Generalized cell maps

TL;DR

The paper extends the notion of cell maps to generalized cell structures (g-cell structures), enabling a broader class of spaces to be realized as quotients of inverse limits. It defines weak g-cell maps and g-cell maps, analyzes when maps between inverse limits induce continuous maps on quotient spaces and , and provides both existence results and continuity criteria. A key contribution is showing how cell maps induce weak g-cell maps and how g-cell maps yield corresponding induced maps on quotients, along with constructive methods to realize a given continuous as under additional hypotheses. The work also clarifies limitations by presenting examples where continuity fails to lift from quotients or from set-valued maps, thereby mapping the boundary between discrete and non-discrete settings in generalized cellular frameworks. Overall, this extends representability and continuity transfer in inverse-limit constructions to a wider, non-discrete context with practical implications for topology and related areas.

Abstract

In [6] the notion of a g-cell structure was introduced as a generalization of the construction proposed by Debski and Tymchatyn to realize a certain class of topological spaces as quotient spaces of inverse limits. In [2], cell maps are defined between cell structures and showed that a cell map between two complete cell structures induces a continuous function between the spaces determined by the cell structures. In this paper, for g-cell structures, we introduce the notions of weak g-cell maps and g-cell maps. We give some conditions for weak g-cell and g-cell mappings between g-cell structures to induce continuous mappings between their corresponding spaces.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 9 theorems, 12 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 9 theorems, 12 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.2

Let $\left\{ \left( G_{n},r_{n}\right) ,g_{n}^{n+1}\right\} _{n\in \mathbb{N} }$ be a cell structure and let $\left\{ \left( H_{n},s_{n}\right) ,h_{n}^{n+1}\right\} _{n\in \mathbb{N} }$ be a complete cell structrures. If $f\colon\underset{i\in \mathbb{N} }{\bigcup }G_{i}\rightarrow \underset{i\in \m

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Example 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • Example 2.6
  • Definition 3.1
  • ...and 13 more