Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$C_2$-Equivariant Orthogonal Calculus

Emel Yavuz

TL;DR

This work develops a $C_2$-equivariant version of orthogonal calculus by introducing a bi-graded index $(p,q)$ and constructing a full model-categorical framework from input functors to stable spectra. The authors define polynomial and homogeneous functors in the equivariant setting, prove two commuting directions of differentiation, and establish a zig-zag of Quillen equivalences connecting the $(p,q)$-homogeneous theory to genuine orthogonal $C_2$-spectra with $O(p,q)$-action. The central result is a Weiss-type classification: every $(p,q)$-homogeneous functor is objectwise equivalent to $V\mapsto \Omega^\infty[(S^{(p,q)V}\wedge\Theta)_{hO(p,q)}]$ for some $\Theta$ in $C_2 Sp^O[O(p,q)]$, and conversely any such form arises from a spectrum. These results extend orthogonal calculus to the equivariant realm, enabling computation of derivatives and classification of layers in contexts with $C_2$-symmetry, with potential applications to equivariant diffeomorphism theories and beyond.

Abstract

In this paper, we construct a version of orthogonal calculus for functors from $C_2$-representations to $C_2$-spaces, where $C_2$ is the cyclic group of order 2. For example, the functor $BO(-)$, that sends a $C_2$-representation to the classifying space of its orthogonal group, which has a $C_2$-action induced by the action on the $C_2$-representation. We obtain a bigraded sequence of approximations to such a functor, and via a zig-zag of Quillen equivalences, we prove that the homotopy fibres of maps between approximations are fully determined by orthogonal spectra with a genuine action of $C_2$ and a naive action of the orthogonal group $O(p,q):=O(\mathbb{R}^{p+qδ})$.

$C_2$-Equivariant Orthogonal Calculus

TL;DR

This work develops a -equivariant version of orthogonal calculus by introducing a bi-graded index and constructing a full model-categorical framework from input functors to stable spectra. The authors define polynomial and homogeneous functors in the equivariant setting, prove two commuting directions of differentiation, and establish a zig-zag of Quillen equivalences connecting the -homogeneous theory to genuine orthogonal -spectra with -action. The central result is a Weiss-type classification: every -homogeneous functor is objectwise equivalent to for some in , and conversely any such form arises from a spectrum. These results extend orthogonal calculus to the equivariant realm, enabling computation of derivatives and classification of layers in contexts with -symmetry, with potential applications to equivariant diffeomorphism theories and beyond.

Abstract

In this paper, we construct a version of orthogonal calculus for functors from -representations to -spaces, where is the cyclic group of order 2. For example, the functor , that sends a -representation to the classifying space of its orthogonal group, which has a -action induced by the action on the -representation. We obtain a bigraded sequence of approximations to such a functor, and via a zig-zag of Quillen equivalences, we prove that the homotopy fibres of maps between approximations are fully determined by orthogonal spectra with a genuine action of and a naive action of the orthogonal group .
Paper Structure (17 sections, 53 theorems, 142 equations)

This paper contains 17 sections, 53 theorems, 142 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $p,q\geq 1$. If $F$ is a $(p,q)$-homogeneous functor, then $F$ is objectwise weakly equivalent to where $\Theta_F^{p,q}\in C_2 Sp^{\mathcal{O}}[O(p,q)]$ and $(-)_{hO(p,q)}$ denotes homotopy orbits. Conversely, every functor of the form where $\Theta\in C_2 Sp^{\mathcal{O}}[O(p,q)]$, is $(p,q)$-homogeneous.

Theorems & Definitions (125)

  • Theorem A: Theorem \ref{['weissclassification']}
  • Theorem B: Theorem \ref{['boclassification']} and Theorem \ref{['QEstabletospectra']}
  • Theorem C: Theorem \ref{['thm: DYpq is homog']}
  • Proposition D: Proposition \ref{['cofibseq']}
  • Definition 2.1.1
  • Remark 2.1.2
  • Definition 2.1.3
  • Proposition 2.1.4
  • Definition 2.2.1
  • Theorem 2.2.2: The Equivariant Splitting Theorems
  • ...and 115 more