Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Reduced digital nets

Vishnupriya Anupindi, Peter Kritzer

TL;DR

The paper investigates using row, column, and column-row reduced digital nets to accelerate QMC vector-matrix products $XA$ in integration rules, by inducing repetitive structure in the quadrature points. It derives explicit bounds on the quality parameters $\rho_m$ and the minimal $t$-value for row-reduced and column-row reduced nets, enabling error analysis via the weighted star discrepancy. It provides concrete computational cost reductions for point generation and the matrix-matrix product, and it extends the framework to projected nets with performance guarantees. Numerical experiments in Julia demonstrate practical speed-ups for column-row and column reductions relative to row reductions and standard methods, validating the proposed approach for high-dimensional QMC integration. These results offer a principled route to faster QMC-based integration when the vector-matrix product is the bottleneck, accompanied by rigorous error control through projected net parameters and discrepancy bounds.

Abstract

In the recent papers ``The fast reduced QMC matrix-vector product'' (J. Comput. Appl. Math. 440, 115642, 2024) and ``Column reduced digital nets'' (submitted), it was proposed to use QMC rules based on reduced digital nets which provide a speed-up in the computation of QMC vector-matrix products that may occur in practical applications. In this paper, we provide upper bounds on the quality parameter of row reduced and column-row reduced digital nets, which are helpful for the error analysis of using reduced point sets as integration nodes in a QMC rule. We also give remarks on further aspects and comparisons of row reduced, column reduced, and column-row reduced digital net.

Reduced digital nets

TL;DR

The paper investigates using row, column, and column-row reduced digital nets to accelerate QMC vector-matrix products in integration rules, by inducing repetitive structure in the quadrature points. It derives explicit bounds on the quality parameters and the minimal -value for row-reduced and column-row reduced nets, enabling error analysis via the weighted star discrepancy. It provides concrete computational cost reductions for point generation and the matrix-matrix product, and it extends the framework to projected nets with performance guarantees. Numerical experiments in Julia demonstrate practical speed-ups for column-row and column reductions relative to row reductions and standard methods, validating the proposed approach for high-dimensional QMC integration. These results offer a principled route to faster QMC-based integration when the vector-matrix product is the bottleneck, accompanied by rigorous error control through projected net parameters and discrepancy bounds.

Abstract

In the recent papers ``The fast reduced QMC matrix-vector product'' (J. Comput. Appl. Math. 440, 115642, 2024) and ``Column reduced digital nets'' (submitted), it was proposed to use QMC rules based on reduced digital nets which provide a speed-up in the computation of QMC vector-matrix products that may occur in practical applications. In this paper, we provide upper bounds on the quality parameter of row reduced and column-row reduced digital nets, which are helpful for the error analysis of using reduced point sets as integration nodes in a QMC rule. We also give remarks on further aspects and comparisons of row reduced, column reduced, and column-row reduced digital net.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 3 theorems, 44 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 9 sections, 3 theorems, 44 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let ${\mathcal{P}}$ be a digital $(t,m,s)$-net over ${\mathbb{F}}_b$ with generating matrices $C_1^{(m)}, \dots ,C_s^{(m)}$. Let $\widetilde{C}_1^{(m)},\ldots,\widetilde{C}_s^{(m)}$ be row reduced with respect to reduction indices $0= w_1 \leq \dots \leq w_s$, and let $\widetilde{t}$ be the minimal and $\widetilde{t} \leq \min \{m, \max \{t,w_s \} \}$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: $m=12,\tau = 20$, varying $w_j$
  • Figure 2: $s=800, \tau = 20$, varying $m$

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Definition 3
  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Remark 1: Row reduced nets
  • Remark 2: Column reduced nets
  • Corollary 1
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • ...and 2 more