Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Completeness and additive property for submeasures

Jonathan M. Keith, Paolo Leonetti

TL;DR

The paper characterizes when the pseudometric space built from a submeasure, (Σ,d_ν) with d_ν(A,B)=min{1,ν(AΔB)}, is complete, proving an AP0-like criterion for submeasures: completeness holds iff increasing sequences with finite total ν- increment admit a limit set A with ν(A_n∖A)=0 and ν(A∖A_n)→0. It then shows a broad positive result: every lower semicontinuous submeasure φ on P(ω) yields a complete space (P(ω), d_{||·||_φ}) and extends to weighted upper densities, addressing gaps in earlier claims by Just–Krawczyk and Farah. Conversely, it establishes negative results for upper densities, proving that any μ^* dominating bd^* (in particular, bd^* itself and Buck density) yields an incomplete pseudometric space, highlighting a clear contrast between additively-defined densities and non-additive submeasures. The proofs blend Stone space techniques with careful Cauchy-sequence constructions and explicit counterexamples, advancing understanding of when submeasures induce complete metric structures and clarifying the behavior of upper densities in this context.

Abstract

Given an extended real-valued submeasure $ν$ defined on a field of subsets $Σ$ of a given set, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for which the pseudometric $d_ν$ defined by $d_ν(A,B):=\min\{1,ν(A\bigtriangleup B)\}$ for all $A,B \in Σ$ is complete. As an application, we show that if $\varphi: \mathcal{P}(ω)\to [0,\infty]$ is a lower semicontinuous submeasure and $ν(A):=\lim_n \varphi(A\setminus \{0, 1, \ldots, n-1\})$ for all $A\subseteq ω$, then $d_ν$ is complete. This includes the case of all weighted upper densities, fixing a gap in a proof by Just and Krawczyk in [Trans.~Amer.~Math.~Soc.~\textbf{285} (1984), 803--816]. In contrast, we prove that if $ν$ is the upper Banach density (or an upper density greater than or equal to the latter) then $d_ν$ is not complete.

Completeness and additive property for submeasures

TL;DR

The paper characterizes when the pseudometric space built from a submeasure, (Σ,d_ν) with d_ν(A,B)=min{1,ν(AΔB)}, is complete, proving an AP0-like criterion for submeasures: completeness holds iff increasing sequences with finite total ν- increment admit a limit set A with ν(A_n∖A)=0 and ν(A∖A_n)→0. It then shows a broad positive result: every lower semicontinuous submeasure φ on P(ω) yields a complete space (P(ω), d_{||·||_φ}) and extends to weighted upper densities, addressing gaps in earlier claims by Just–Krawczyk and Farah. Conversely, it establishes negative results for upper densities, proving that any μ^* dominating bd^* (in particular, bd^* itself and Buck density) yields an incomplete pseudometric space, highlighting a clear contrast between additively-defined densities and non-additive submeasures. The proofs blend Stone space techniques with careful Cauchy-sequence constructions and explicit counterexamples, advancing understanding of when submeasures induce complete metric structures and clarifying the behavior of upper densities in this context.

Abstract

Given an extended real-valued submeasure defined on a field of subsets of a given set, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for which the pseudometric defined by for all is complete. As an application, we show that if is a lower semicontinuous submeasure and for all , then is complete. This includes the case of all weighted upper densities, fixing a gap in a proof by Just and Krawczyk in [Trans.~Amer.~Math.~Soc.~\textbf{285} (1984), 803--816]. In contrast, we prove that if is the upper Banach density (or an upper density greater than or equal to the latter) then is not complete.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 12 theorems, 55 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 12 theorems, 55 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\Sigma \subseteq \mathcal{P}(X)$ be a $\sigma$-field of subsets on a set $X$, and let $\mu: \Sigma \to \mathbb{R}$ be a nonnegative, finitely additive, bounded map. The following are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.4
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.5
  • proof
  • ...and 19 more