Parallel Belief Contraction via Order Aggregation
Jake Chandler, Richard Booth
TL;DR
The paper addresses extending AGM-style belief contraction to parallel and iterated parallel change. It introduces an n-ary TeamQueue aggregation framework to lift serial contraction operators into the parallel domain. Key results include an axiomatic characterization of n-ary TeamQueue aggregators, the connection between the STQ variant and rational closure, and a concrete formulation of iterated parallel contraction. The approach offers a principled, scalable method for parallel belief change with potential applications beyond belief revision, including judgment and preference aggregation.
Abstract
The standard ``serial'' (aka ``singleton'') model of belief contraction models the manner in which an agent's corpus of beliefs responds to the removal of a single item of information. One salient extension of this model introduces the idea of ``parallel'' (aka ``package'' or ``multiple'') change, in which an entire set of items of information are simultaneously removed. Existing research on the latter has largely focussed on single-step parallel contraction: understanding the behaviour of beliefs after a single parallel contraction. It has also focussed on generalisations to the parallel case of serial contraction operations whose characteristic properties are extremely weak. Here we consider how to extend serial contraction operations that obey stronger properties. Potentially more importantly, we also consider the iterated case: the behaviour of beliefs after a sequence of parallel contractions. We propose a general method for extending serial iterated belief change operators to handle parallel change based on an n-ary generalisation of Booth & Chandler's TeamQueue binary order aggregators.
