Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Simpliciality of vector-valued function spaces

Ondřej F. K. Kalenda, Jiří Spurný

TL;DR

This work develops a framework for integral representations of vector-valued function spaces $H\subset C(K,E)$, introducing two dual notions of simpliciality: vector simpliciality (via $E^*$-valued vector measures for functionals) and weak simpliciality (via scalar measures for operators). It shows these notions are generally incomparable, though when $H$ contains constants vector simpliciality is stronger, and it provides multiple characterizations and stability results under renorming. The paper also extends Choquet boundary theory to the vector-valued setting, defines $H$-boundary measures, and proves two representation theorems that connect to four notions of affine structure through $A_c^w(H)$ and $A_c^v(H)$. Additionally, it develops dilation tools, Dirichlet-type extension results, and a Batty-inspired ordering of measures, yielding detailed criteria for boundary measures and maximality. Together these results illuminate the structure and representation theory of vector-valued function spaces, with implications for functional-analytic and Choquet-theoretic analyses of $H$-boundary phenomena.

Abstract

We investigate integral representation of vector-valued function spaces, i.e., of subspaces $H\subset C(K,E)$, where $K$ is a compact space and $E$ is a (real or complex) Banach space. We point out that there are two possible ways of generalizing representation theorems known from the scalar case -- either one may represent (all) functionals from $H^*$ using $E^*$-valued vector measures on $K$ (as it is done in the literature) or one may represent (some) operators from $L(H,E)$ by scalar measures on $K$ using the Bochner integral. These two ways lead to two different notions of simpliciality which we call `vector simpliciality' and `weak simpliciality'. It turns out that these two notions are in general incomparable. Moreover, the weak simpliciality is not affected by renorming the target space $E$, while vector simpliciality may be affected. Further, if $H$ contains constants, vector simpliciality is strictly stronger and admits several characterizations (partially analogous to the characterizations known in the scalar case). We also study orderings of measures inspired by C.J.K.~Batty which may be (in special cases) used to characterize $H$-boundary measures. Finally, we give a finer version of representation theorem using positive measures on $K\times B_{E^*}$ and characterize uniqueness in this case.

Simpliciality of vector-valued function spaces

TL;DR

This work develops a framework for integral representations of vector-valued function spaces , introducing two dual notions of simpliciality: vector simpliciality (via -valued vector measures for functionals) and weak simpliciality (via scalar measures for operators). It shows these notions are generally incomparable, though when contains constants vector simpliciality is stronger, and it provides multiple characterizations and stability results under renorming. The paper also extends Choquet boundary theory to the vector-valued setting, defines -boundary measures, and proves two representation theorems that connect to four notions of affine structure through and . Additionally, it develops dilation tools, Dirichlet-type extension results, and a Batty-inspired ordering of measures, yielding detailed criteria for boundary measures and maximality. Together these results illuminate the structure and representation theory of vector-valued function spaces, with implications for functional-analytic and Choquet-theoretic analyses of -boundary phenomena.

Abstract

We investigate integral representation of vector-valued function spaces, i.e., of subspaces , where is a compact space and is a (real or complex) Banach space. We point out that there are two possible ways of generalizing representation theorems known from the scalar case -- either one may represent (all) functionals from using -valued vector measures on (as it is done in the literature) or one may represent (some) operators from by scalar measures on using the Bochner integral. These two ways lead to two different notions of simpliciality which we call `vector simpliciality' and `weak simpliciality'. It turns out that these two notions are in general incomparable. Moreover, the weak simpliciality is not affected by renorming the target space , while vector simpliciality may be affected. Further, if contains constants, vector simpliciality is strictly stronger and admits several characterizations (partially analogous to the characterizations known in the scalar case). We also study orderings of measures inspired by C.J.K.~Batty which may be (in special cases) used to characterize -boundary measures. Finally, we give a finer version of representation theorem using positive measures on and characterize uniqueness in this case.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 53 theorems, 324 equations)

This paper contains 23 sections, 53 theorems, 324 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 3.1

Let $H\subset C(K,E)$ be a linear subspace. Then and it is a compact subset of $B_{L(H,E)}$ in the weak operator topology.

Theorems & Definitions (133)

  • proof
  • proof
  • Example 2.3
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Example 3.3
  • Lemma 3.4
  • proof
  • ...and 123 more