Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On nodal solutions with a prescribed number of nodes for a Kirchhoff-type problem

Haining Fan, Marco Squassina, Jianjun Zhang

TL;DR

This paper addresses the existence of infinitely many radial sign-changing solutions for a Kirchhoff-type nonlocal problem in $\mathbb{R}^3$ with nonlinearity $|u|^{p-2}u$ for $2<p<4$. The authors develop a variational approach based on a novel Nehari-type manifold $N_k^-$ for an auxiliary system, enabling a gluing construction across annuli to produce solutions with exactly $k$ nodal domains and showing energy monotonicity in $k$. They prove that for each $k$ there exists a small $b^*>0$ such that, for $b\in(0,b^*)$, a radial solution $u_k^b$ with $k$ sign changes exists and satisfies $I_b(u_{k+1})>I_b(u_k)$; moreover, as $b\to0^+$, $u_k^b$ converges in $\mathcal{H}$ to the least-energy radial solution $u_k^0$ of the limiting local equation $-\\\Delta u+V(x)u=|u|^{p-2}u$. This work extends previous nodal-solution results to the challenging $2<p<4$ regime and provides a robust framework for nonlocal Kirchhoff problems via constrained Nehari manifolds and annular gluing.

Abstract

We are concerned with the existence and asymptotic behavior of multiple radial sign-changing solutions with the nodal characterization for a Kirchhoff-type problem involving the nonlinearity $|u|^{p-2}u(2<p<4)$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$. By developing some useful analysis techniques and introducing a novel definition of the Nehari manifold for the auxiliary system of the equations, we show that, for any positive integer $k$, the problem has a sign-changing solution $u_k^b$ changing signs exactly $k$ times. Furthermore, the energy of $u_k^b$ is strictly increasing in $k$, as well as some asymptotic behaviors of $u_k^b$ are obtained. Our result is a complement of [Deng Y, Peng S, Shuai W, {\it J. Funct. Anal.}, {\bf269}(2015), 3500-3527], where the case $2<p<4$ is left open.

On nodal solutions with a prescribed number of nodes for a Kirchhoff-type problem

TL;DR

This paper addresses the existence of infinitely many radial sign-changing solutions for a Kirchhoff-type nonlocal problem in with nonlinearity for . The authors develop a variational approach based on a novel Nehari-type manifold for an auxiliary system, enabling a gluing construction across annuli to produce solutions with exactly nodal domains and showing energy monotonicity in . They prove that for each there exists a small such that, for , a radial solution with sign changes exists and satisfies ; moreover, as , converges in to the least-energy radial solution of the limiting local equation . This work extends previous nodal-solution results to the challenging regime and provides a robust framework for nonlocal Kirchhoff problems via constrained Nehari manifolds and annular gluing.

Abstract

We are concerned with the existence and asymptotic behavior of multiple radial sign-changing solutions with the nodal characterization for a Kirchhoff-type problem involving the nonlinearity in . By developing some useful analysis techniques and introducing a novel definition of the Nehari manifold for the auxiliary system of the equations, we show that, for any positive integer , the problem has a sign-changing solution changing signs exactly times. Furthermore, the energy of is strictly increasing in , as well as some asymptotic behaviors of are obtained. Our result is a complement of [Deng Y, Peng S, Shuai W, {\it J. Funct. Anal.}, {\bf269}(2015), 3500-3527], where the case is left open.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 8 theorems, 188 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 8 theorems, 188 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

(Existence of nodal solutioins) Assume that the assumption (V) holds and $3<p<4$. Then for every integer $k>0$, there exists $b^*>0$ which is defined in Lemma l2.4 such that for any $b\in(0,b^*)$, (s1.1) admits a radial solution $u_k$, which changes exactly $k$-times.

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • ...and 8 more