Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Ordering digraphs with maximum outdegrees by their $A_α$ spectral radius

Zengzhao Xu, Weige Xi, Ligong Wang

TL;DR

This work studies ordering of strongly connected digraphs by the $A_\alpha$ spectral radius $\lambda_\alpha(G)$ for $\alpha\in[\tfrac{1}{2},1)$. It provides two key upper bounds on $\lambda_\alpha(G)$ in terms of the maximum outdegree and arc/vertex counts, leveraging standard lemmas that relate $\lambda_\alpha(G)$ to local degree data. The main results show that, under suitable conditions on $\Delta^+(G)$ and the arc count $m$, one digraph with larger maximum outdegree has strictly larger $\lambda_\alpha$ (Theorem 1.1) or exceeds the other by at least $\tfrac{1}{4}$ (Theorem 1.2); a corollary strengthens the comparison for larger $\alpha$. These findings extend ordering results from undirected graphs to digraphs via the $A_\alpha$ matrix, providing concrete criteria for comparing digraphs by their outdegree structure.

Abstract

Let $G$ be a strongly connected digraph with $n$ vertices and $m$ arcs. For any real $α\in[0,1]$, the $A_α$ matrix of a digraph $G$ is defined as $$A_α(G)=αD(G)+(1-α)A(G),$$ where $A(G)$ is the adjacency matrix of $G$ and $D(G)$ is the outdegrees diagonal matrix of $G$. The eigenvalue of $A_α(G)$ with the largest modulus is called the $A_α$ spectral radius of $G$, denoted by $λ_α(G)$. In this paper, we first obtain an upper bound on $λ_α(G)$ for $α\in[\frac{1}{2},1)$. Employing this upper bound, we prove that for two strongly connected digraphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ with $n\ge4$ vertices and $m$ arcs, and $α\in [\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},1)$, if the maximum outdegree $Δ^+(G_1)\ge 2α(1-α)(m-n+1)+2α$ and $Δ^+(G_1)>Δ^+(G_2)$, then $λ_α(G_1)>λ_α(G_2)$. Moreover, We also give another upper bound on $λ_α(G)$ for $α\in[\frac{1}{2},1)$. Employing this upper bound, we prove that for two strongly connected digraphs with $m$ arcs, and $α\in[\frac{1}{2},1)$, if the maximum outdegree $Δ^+(G_1)>\frac{2m}{3}+1$ and $Δ^+(G_1)>Δ^+(G_2)$, then $λ_α(G_1)+\frac{1}{4}>λ_α(G_2)$.

Ordering digraphs with maximum outdegrees by their $A_α$ spectral radius

TL;DR

This work studies ordering of strongly connected digraphs by the spectral radius for . It provides two key upper bounds on in terms of the maximum outdegree and arc/vertex counts, leveraging standard lemmas that relate to local degree data. The main results show that, under suitable conditions on and the arc count , one digraph with larger maximum outdegree has strictly larger (Theorem 1.1) or exceeds the other by at least (Theorem 1.2); a corollary strengthens the comparison for larger . These findings extend ordering results from undirected graphs to digraphs via the matrix, providing concrete criteria for comparing digraphs by their outdegree structure.

Abstract

Let be a strongly connected digraph with vertices and arcs. For any real , the matrix of a digraph is defined as where is the adjacency matrix of and is the outdegrees diagonal matrix of . The eigenvalue of with the largest modulus is called the spectral radius of , denoted by . In this paper, we first obtain an upper bound on for . Employing this upper bound, we prove that for two strongly connected digraphs and with vertices and arcs, and , if the maximum outdegree and , then . Moreover, We also give another upper bound on for . Employing this upper bound, we prove that for two strongly connected digraphs with arcs, and , if the maximum outdegree and , then .
Paper Structure (4 sections, 9 theorems, 75 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 4 sections, 9 theorems, 75 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be two strongly connected digraphs with $n\ge4$ vertices and $m$ arcs. For $\alpha\in [\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},1)$, if $\Delta^+(G_1)\ge 2\alpha(1-\alpha)(m-n+1)+2\alpha$ and $\Delta^+(G_1)>\Delta^+(G_2)$, then $\lambda_\alpha(G_1)>\lambda_\alpha(G_2)$.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The digraph $G_1$.
  • Figure 2: The digraphs with size $m=4$.
  • Figure 3: The digraph $G_1$.

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.1
  • proof
  • ...and 3 more