Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Characterizing finite groups whose order supergraphs satisfy a connectivity condition

Ramesh Prasad Panda, Papi Ray

TL;DR

Problem: characterize finite groups whose order supergraphs $\\mathcal{S}(G)$ are cyclically separable. Approach: analyze element orders, clique structures $[x]$ induced by elements with the same order, and divisibility relations within families such as dihedral $D_{2n}$, dicyclic $Q_{4n}$, EPPO groups, nilpotent groups, and symmetric/alternating groups to determine cyclic cutsets. Contributions: exact necessary and sufficient criteria for $\\mathcal{S}(G)$ to be cyclically separable across the listed families, including explicit dihedral conditions on $n$, a non-power-of-two condition for $Q_{4n}$, EPPO-Sylow criteria, nilpotent-factorizations, and $n\ge 4$ for $S_n$ and $A_n$. Significance: advances understanding of how group order structure governs cyclic connectivity in order-based graphs, with potential implications for graph invariants and group-graph classifications.

Abstract

Let $Γ$ be an undirected and simple graph. A set $ S $ of vertices in $Γ$ is called a {cyclic vertex cutset} of $Γ$ if $Γ- S$ is disconnected and has at least two components each containing a cycle. If $Γ$ has a cyclic vertex cutset, then it is said to be {cyclically separable}. For any finite group $G$, the order supergraph $\mathcal{S}(G)$ is the simple and undirected graph whose vertices are elements of $G$, and two vertices are adjacent if as elements of $G$ the order of one divides the order of the other. In this paper, we characterize the finite nilpotent groups and various non-nilpotent groups, such as the dihedral groups, the dicyclic groups, the EPPO groups, the symmetric groups, and the alternating groups, whose order supergraphs are cyclically separable.

Characterizing finite groups whose order supergraphs satisfy a connectivity condition

TL;DR

Problem: characterize finite groups whose order supergraphs are cyclically separable. Approach: analyze element orders, clique structures induced by elements with the same order, and divisibility relations within families such as dihedral , dicyclic , EPPO groups, nilpotent groups, and symmetric/alternating groups to determine cyclic cutsets. Contributions: exact necessary and sufficient criteria for to be cyclically separable across the listed families, including explicit dihedral conditions on , a non-power-of-two condition for , EPPO-Sylow criteria, nilpotent-factorizations, and for and . Significance: advances understanding of how group order structure governs cyclic connectivity in order-based graphs, with potential implications for graph invariants and group-graph classifications.

Abstract

Let be an undirected and simple graph. A set of vertices in is called a {cyclic vertex cutset} of if is disconnected and has at least two components each containing a cycle. If has a cyclic vertex cutset, then it is said to be {cyclically separable}. For any finite group , the order supergraph is the simple and undirected graph whose vertices are elements of , and two vertices are adjacent if as elements of the order of one divides the order of the other. In this paper, we characterize the finite nilpotent groups and various non-nilpotent groups, such as the dihedral groups, the dicyclic groups, the EPPO groups, the symmetric groups, and the alternating groups, whose order supergraphs are cyclically separable.
Paper Structure (2 sections, 7 theorems, 3 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 2 sections, 7 theorems, 3 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

For any positive integer $n \geq 3$, $\mathcal{S}(D_{2n})$ is cyclically separable if and only if the following hold:

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: $\mathcal{S}(D_{2n}) - (\{e\} \cup [a])$
  • Figure 2: $\mathcal{S}(G)$
  • Figure 3: $\mathcal{S}(G)$
  • Figure 4: $\mathcal{S}(G) - \{e\}$
  • Figure 5: $\mathcal{S}(G) - (\{e\} \cup X_{12})$

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.6
  • ...and 3 more