Local Limits of Small World Networks
Yeganeh Alimohammadi, Senem Işık, Amin Saberi
TL;DR
This work establishes Benjamini–Schramm local convergence for two canonical small-world models, Watts–Strogatz and Kleinberg, by deriving their local limit objects. The Watts–Strogatz limit is described by a recursive Full/Reduced k–Fuzz structure, enabling immediate convergence of local functionals such as clustering and PageRank. For Kleinberg, the limit exhibits a phase transition at the distance-decay exponent ll=2: ll e 2 yields a patch-based tree-like limit, while ll>2 yields locally bounded shortcuts with lattice-distance kernels, and both regimes admit lattice-to-graph convergence. These local limits imply that many global phenomena, including information cascades and routing efficiency, can be analyzed from finite local neighborhoods, providing a rigorous framework for understanding small-world networks at scale.
Abstract
Small-world networks, known for their high local clustering and short average path lengths, are a fundamental structure in many real-world systems, including social, biological, and technological networks. We apply the theory of local convergence (Benjamini-Schramm convergence) to derive the limiting behavior of the local structures for two of the most commonly studied small-world network models: the Watts-Strogatz model and the Kleinberg model. Establishing local convergence enables us to show that key network measures, such as PageRank, clustering coefficients, and maximum matching size, converge as network size increases with their limits determined by the graph's local structure. Additionally, this framework facilitates the estimation of global phenomena, such as information cascades, using local information from small neighborhoods. As an additional outcome of our results, we observe a critical change in the behavior of the limit exactly when the parameter governing long-range connections in the Kleinberg model crosses the threshold where decentralized search remains efficient, offering a new perspective on why decentralized algorithms fail in certain regimes.
