Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An equivariant Laudenbach-Poénaru theorem

Jeffrey Meier, Evan Scott

TL;DR

The paper generalizes the Laudenbach–Poénaru extension theorem to finite group actions by introducing linearly parted $G$-actions on 4D $1$-handlebodies, proving that any finite group action on $Y=\#^n(S^1\times S^2)$ extends to a linearly parted $G$-action on $X=\natural^n(S^1\times B^3)$, with two extensions equivariantly diffeomorphic rel-boundary. It builds the theory from 3D equivariant topology (e.g., the Equivariant Sphere and Loop Theorems) and linear action characterizations to control attaching spheres and handle-cancellations, yielding a robust equivariant handlebody framework. The work also extends to pairs $(Y,L)$ with $G$-invariant unlink $L$ and $G$-equivariant boundary-parallel disk-tangles $\mathcal{D}$, proving existence and uniqueness of equivariant fillings $(X,\mathcal{D})$ up to $G$-diffeomorphism rel-boundary. These results lay groundwork for equivariant trisections and Kirby calculus in dimension four, and motivate open questions about four-dimensional linearization and fixed-point data determining smooth action classes.

Abstract

A foundational theorem of Laudenbach and Poénaru states that any diffeomorphism of $\#^n(S^1\times S^2)$ extends to a diffeomorphism of $\natural^n(S^1\times B^3)$. We prove a generalization of this theorem that accounts for the presence of a finite group action on $\#^n(S^1\times S^2)$. Our proof is independent of the classical theorem, so by considering the trivial group action, we give a new proof of the classical theorem. Specifically, we show that any finite group action on $\#^n(S^1\times S^2)$ extends to a $\textit{linearly parted}$ action on $\natural^n(S^1\times B^3)$ and that any two such extensions are equivariantly diffeomorphic. Roughly, a linearly parted action respects a decomposition into equivariant $0$-handles and $1$-handles, where, for each handle in the decomposition, its stabilizer acts linearly on that handle. The restriction to linearly parted actions is important, because there are infinitely many distinct nonlinear actions on $B^4$ with identical actions on $\partial B^4$; these nonlinear actions give extensions of the same action on $\partial B^4$ which are $\textit{not}$ equivariantly diffeomorphic. We also prove a more general theorem: Every finite group action on $\left(\#^n(S^1\times S^2),L\right)$, with $L$ an invariant unlink, extends across a pair $\left(\natural^n(S^1\times B^3),\mathcal{D}\right)$, with $\mathcal{D}$ an equivariantly boundary-parallel disk-tangle, and any two such extensions are equivariantly diffeomorphic.

An equivariant Laudenbach-Poénaru theorem

TL;DR

The paper generalizes the Laudenbach–Poénaru extension theorem to finite group actions by introducing linearly parted -actions on 4D -handlebodies, proving that any finite group action on extends to a linearly parted -action on , with two extensions equivariantly diffeomorphic rel-boundary. It builds the theory from 3D equivariant topology (e.g., the Equivariant Sphere and Loop Theorems) and linear action characterizations to control attaching spheres and handle-cancellations, yielding a robust equivariant handlebody framework. The work also extends to pairs with -invariant unlink and -equivariant boundary-parallel disk-tangles , proving existence and uniqueness of equivariant fillings up to -diffeomorphism rel-boundary. These results lay groundwork for equivariant trisections and Kirby calculus in dimension four, and motivate open questions about four-dimensional linearization and fixed-point data determining smooth action classes.

Abstract

A foundational theorem of Laudenbach and Poénaru states that any diffeomorphism of extends to a diffeomorphism of . We prove a generalization of this theorem that accounts for the presence of a finite group action on . Our proof is independent of the classical theorem, so by considering the trivial group action, we give a new proof of the classical theorem. Specifically, we show that any finite group action on extends to a action on and that any two such extensions are equivariantly diffeomorphic. Roughly, a linearly parted action respects a decomposition into equivariant -handles and -handles, where, for each handle in the decomposition, its stabilizer acts linearly on that handle. The restriction to linearly parted actions is important, because there are infinitely many distinct nonlinear actions on with identical actions on ; these nonlinear actions give extensions of the same action on which are equivariantly diffeomorphic. We also prove a more general theorem: Every finite group action on , with an invariant unlink, extends across a pair , with an equivariantly boundary-parallel disk-tangle, and any two such extensions are equivariantly diffeomorphic.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 20 theorems, 2 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 9 sections, 20 theorems, 2 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 2.2

A linear $G$--action on $B^n$ is the equivariant cone of the induced $G$--action on $\partial B^n$, with the origin as cone point. Furthermore, if the action on $B^n$ has a fixed point $p$ in $\partial B^n$, then the action on $B^n$ is the equivariant cone of the induced action on an invariant $(n-1

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: An action on $B^n$ fixing a point $p$ in the boundary is the equivariant cone on an invariant $B^{n-1}$ in its boundary with cone point $p$.
  • Figure 2: A solid torus, linearly parted into 3--balls with respect to the obvious, cyclic $\mathbb{Z}_6$--action
  • Figure 3: Left: Removing the purple disk on the right from this punctured $3$--ball splits it into two punctured $3$--balls, and attaching the green disk on the left splits the puncture in two, so that the left-hand punctured $3$--ball turns into another punctured $3$--ball with one more puncture, as in Lemma \ref{['lem:innermost']}. Right: A schematic for the tube-and-cap approach in Lemma \ref{['lem:new_ball-system']}, with an initial choice of innermost sphere $S_I$ and capping 3--ball $B_I$ indicated.

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Definition 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Definition 3.3
  • Corollary 3.6
  • ...and 39 more