Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Vortices for lake equations (review with questions and speculations)

Jair Koiller

TL;DR

This paper surveys a geometric-mechanics perspective on the lake equations with bathymetry, formulating vortex dynamics via the Green function $G_{L_b}$ of the elliptic operator $L_b = -\operatorname{div}(\tfrac{1}{b}\nabla)$. It derives a vortex Hamiltonian with mutual interactions $\sum_{j<k} \Gamma_j \Gamma_k G_{L_b}(z_j,z_k)$ and a self-energy $Rich_b$, and discusses the need to include background/pseudoharmonic flows in multiply connected domains through a Hodge-type decomposition and a capacity matrix $P^b$, while outlining extensions to curved geometries and Riemann surfaces. The work connects rip-current physics to classical vortex-ring theory and sketches a program to develop coupled vortex–harmonic dynamics on closed surfaces via the Schottky double, addressing how to incorporate pseudopotential flows and boundary circulations. It highlights key mathematical questions about Green-function representations, operator choices, and rigorous vortex–pseudopotential coupling in complex geometries, setting a roadmap for future rigorous and applied developments.

Abstract

The `lake equation' on a planar domain D with bathymetry b(x,y) is given by $ \partial_t u + (u \cdot {\rm grad}) u= -{\rm grad}\, p \,, \,\,{\rm div} (b u) = 0 \,,\, \text{with}\,\, u \parallel \partial D.$ % \, \,\, \,\,\, \text{),}$$ We focus on Geometric Mechanics aspects, glossing over hard analysis issues. % related to the desingularization. Motivating example is a `rip current' produced by vortex pairs near a beach shore. For uniform slope beach there is a perfect analogy with \ Thomson's vortex rings. The stream function produced by a vortex is defined as the Green function of the operator $- {\rm div} ( {\rm grad} ψ/b)$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions. As in elasticity, the lake equations give rise to pseudoanalytical functions and quasiconformal mappings. Uniformly elliptic equations on closed Riemann surfaces could be called `planet equations'.

Vortices for lake equations (review with questions and speculations)

TL;DR

This paper surveys a geometric-mechanics perspective on the lake equations with bathymetry, formulating vortex dynamics via the Green function of the elliptic operator . It derives a vortex Hamiltonian with mutual interactions and a self-energy , and discusses the need to include background/pseudoharmonic flows in multiply connected domains through a Hodge-type decomposition and a capacity matrix , while outlining extensions to curved geometries and Riemann surfaces. The work connects rip-current physics to classical vortex-ring theory and sketches a program to develop coupled vortex–harmonic dynamics on closed surfaces via the Schottky double, addressing how to incorporate pseudopotential flows and boundary circulations. It highlights key mathematical questions about Green-function representations, operator choices, and rigorous vortex–pseudopotential coupling in complex geometries, setting a roadmap for future rigorous and applied developments.

Abstract

The `lake equation' on a planar domain D with bathymetry b(x,y) is given by % \, \,\, \,\,\, \text{),}$- {\rm div} ( {\rm grad} ψ/b)$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions. As in elasticity, the lake equations give rise to pseudoanalytical functions and quasiconformal mappings. Uniformly elliptic equations on closed Riemann surfaces could be called `planet equations'.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 83 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 8 sections, 83 equations, 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Collision of two vortex rings. An important parameter is the thickness. Adapted from ArunColonius2024. Recent videos: Matsuzawa2023, Ryanetal2019.
  • Figure 2: Source: wikipedia (public domain). The wide head of the current indicates the merge of vortex couples.
  • Figure 3: Rip currents periodic pattern Peregrine1998. Clearly visible are the necks and heads. The wide head of the currents indicates the merge of eddy couples.

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 4.1
  • Remark 4.2
  • Remark 5.1