Table of Contents
Fetching ...

2D HQFTs and Frobenius $(\mathcal{G},\mathcal{V})$-categories

Paul Großkopf

TL;DR

The paper extends HQFTs to target pairs $(X,Y)$ and develops a complete 1D classification in terms of dualizable representations of the relative fundamental groupoid $\mathcal{G}=\Pi_1(X,Y)$. For 2D HQFTs, it introduces crossed loop Frobenius $(\mathcal{G},\mathcal{V})$-categories as the governing algebraic structure and proves a classification theorem: 2D $(X,Y)$-HQFTs are equivalent to crossed loop Frobenius $(\mathcal{G},\mathcal{V})$-categories, generalizing the known group case to a groupoid setting. The approach mirrors Turaev's classical results while leveraging the relative homotopy data of $(X,Y)$, thereby providing a unified, functorial framework for HQFTs with basepoints and their 2D realizations. The outlook sketches open/closed HQFTs and related categorical refinements, indicating future work toward a crossed knowledgable Frobenius theory to capture boundary phenomena.

Abstract

Homotopy Quantum Field Theories as variants of Topological Quantum Field Theories are described by functors from some cobordism category, enriched with homotopical data, to a symmetric monoidal category $\mathcal{V}$. A new notion of HQFTs is introduced using target pairs of spaces $(X,Y)$ acounting for basepoints being sent to points in $Y$. Such $(X,Y)$-HQFTs are classified in dimension 1 by dualizable representations of $\mathcal{G}:=Π_1(X,Y)$, the relative fundamental groupoid. For dimension 2, the notion of crossed loop Frobenius $(\mathcal{G},\mathcal{V})$-categories is introduced, generalizing crossed Frobenius $G$-algebras, where $G$ is only a group. After stating generalities of these multi-object generalizations, a classification theorem of 2-dimensional $(X,Y)$-HQFTs via crossed loop Frobenius $(\mathcal{G},\mathcal{V})$-categories is proven.

2D HQFTs and Frobenius $(\mathcal{G},\mathcal{V})$-categories

TL;DR

The paper extends HQFTs to target pairs and develops a complete 1D classification in terms of dualizable representations of the relative fundamental groupoid . For 2D HQFTs, it introduces crossed loop Frobenius -categories as the governing algebraic structure and proves a classification theorem: 2D -HQFTs are equivalent to crossed loop Frobenius -categories, generalizing the known group case to a groupoid setting. The approach mirrors Turaev's classical results while leveraging the relative homotopy data of , thereby providing a unified, functorial framework for HQFTs with basepoints and their 2D realizations. The outlook sketches open/closed HQFTs and related categorical refinements, indicating future work toward a crossed knowledgable Frobenius theory to capture boundary phenomena.

Abstract

Homotopy Quantum Field Theories as variants of Topological Quantum Field Theories are described by functors from some cobordism category, enriched with homotopical data, to a symmetric monoidal category . A new notion of HQFTs is introduced using target pairs of spaces acounting for basepoints being sent to points in . Such -HQFTs are classified in dimension 1 by dualizable representations of , the relative fundamental groupoid. For dimension 2, the notion of crossed loop Frobenius -categories is introduced, generalizing crossed Frobenius -algebras, where is only a group. After stating generalities of these multi-object generalizations, a classification theorem of 2-dimensional -HQFTs via crossed loop Frobenius -categories is proven.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 20 theorems, 75 equations)

This paper contains 13 sections, 20 theorems, 75 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $\mathcal{V}$ be a (strict) symmetric monoidal category. Further let $X$ be a homotopy 1-type, $Y\subset X$, such that for any connected component $C$ of $X$ we have $C\cap Y\neq \emptyset$, and denote $\mathcal{G}= \Pi_1(X,Y)$. The 1-dimensional $(X,Y)$-HQFTs are fully classified by functors such that all objects in the image are dualizable.

Theorems & Definitions (57)

  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Proposition 2.7
  • Theorem 2.8: MacLane as well as Kassel
  • ...and 47 more