Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On symplectic automorphisms of a surface with genus two fibration and their action on $\mathrm{CH}_0$

Jiabin Du, Wenfei Liu

TL;DR

The article addresses how symplectic automorphisms of a surface $S$ with a genus two fibration interact with the zero-th Chow group via the Albanese kernel, proving a sharp bound $|\mathrm{Aut}_s(S)|\le 2$ when $\chi(\mathcal{O}_S)\ge 5$ and showing that these automorphisms act trivially on $\mathrm{CH}_0(S)_{\mathrm{alb}}$ in key geometric scenarios. The authors employ Xiao’s canonical map bounds for genus two fibrations, analyze quotient constructions under a Klein four group with the hyperelliptic involution, and use criteria related to finite-dimensional Chow motives and the Bloch–Beilinson philosophy to deduce trivial actions on $\mathrm{CH}_0(S)_{\mathrm{alb}}$. They demonstrate that for $\chi(\mathcal{O}_S)\ge 5$, automorphisms must preserve the fibration, and in the generic finite-canonical-map case, either the automorphism group is trivial on CH$_0$ or forces a $(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z})^2$-symmetry with a degree-4 canonical map. Collectively, the results provide concrete structural constraints on symplectic automorphisms of genus two fibrations and advance Bloch–Beilinson-type expectations in this geometric setting.

Abstract

Let $S$ be a complex smooth projective surface with a genus two fibration, and $\mathrm{Aut}_s(S)$ the group of symplectic automorphisms, fixing every holomorphic 2-forms (if any) on $S$. Based on the work of Jin-Xing Cai, we observe in this paper that, if $χ(\mathcal{O}_S)\geq 5$, then $|\mathrm{Aut}_s(S)|\leq 2$. Then we go on to verify, under some conditions, that $\mathrm{Aut}_s(S)$ acts trivially on the Albanese kernel $\mathrm{CH}_0(S)_{\mathrm{alb}}$ of the 0-th Chow group, which is predicted by a conjecture of Bloch and Beilinson. As a consequence, if an automorphism $σ\in \mathrm{Aut}(S)$ acts trivially on $H^{i,0}(S)$ for $0\leq i\leq 2$, then it also acts trivially on $\mathrm{CH}_0(S)_{\mathrm{alb}}$.

On symplectic automorphisms of a surface with genus two fibration and their action on $\mathrm{CH}_0$

TL;DR

The article addresses how symplectic automorphisms of a surface with a genus two fibration interact with the zero-th Chow group via the Albanese kernel, proving a sharp bound when and showing that these automorphisms act trivially on in key geometric scenarios. The authors employ Xiao’s canonical map bounds for genus two fibrations, analyze quotient constructions under a Klein four group with the hyperelliptic involution, and use criteria related to finite-dimensional Chow motives and the Bloch–Beilinson philosophy to deduce trivial actions on . They demonstrate that for , automorphisms must preserve the fibration, and in the generic finite-canonical-map case, either the automorphism group is trivial on CH or forces a -symmetry with a degree-4 canonical map. Collectively, the results provide concrete structural constraints on symplectic automorphisms of genus two fibrations and advance Bloch–Beilinson-type expectations in this geometric setting.

Abstract

Let be a complex smooth projective surface with a genus two fibration, and the group of symplectic automorphisms, fixing every holomorphic 2-forms (if any) on . Based on the work of Jin-Xing Cai, we observe in this paper that, if , then . Then we go on to verify, under some conditions, that acts trivially on the Albanese kernel of the 0-th Chow group, which is predicted by a conjecture of Bloch and Beilinson. As a consequence, if an automorphism acts trivially on for , then it also acts trivially on .
Paper Structure (6 sections, 16 theorems, 29 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 16 theorems, 29 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.4

Let $S$ be a surface of general type with a genus two fibration $f\colon S\rightarrow B$ and $\chi(\mathcal{O}_S)\geq 5$. Suppose that $\mathrm{Aut}_s(S)$ is nontrivial. Then the following holds.

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Conjecture 1.1: Voi03
  • Conjecture 1.2: Blo75, see also Voi03
  • Conjecture 1.3: cf. Voi12
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3: cf. DL23
  • ...and 20 more