Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Chromatic Purity in Hermitian K-Theory at $p=2$

Jordan Levin

TL;DR

This work analyzes chromatic behavior of L-theory at the prime $p=2$ by embedding additive Hermitian $K$-theory into the framework of Poincaré categories. It proves a chromatic purity result: for an $\mathbf{E}_1$-ring with anti-involution $(A,\sigma)$, the maps to $L_n^f A$ and to $L_T A$ induce $T(n)$-local equivalences on quadratic $L$-theory, implying no chromatic redshift and enabling higher chromatic vanishing results in idempotent complete Poincaré categories. The paper also develops descent/ fracture-square techniques for Hermitian $K$-theory, deriving chromatic descent properties for $GW$-theory and establishing a chromatic analogue of the homotopy limit problem in this Hermitian setting. Leveraging additive $L$-theory and trace methods, the results integrate with existing redshift and vanishing frameworks and set the stage for further applications of Hermitian trace methods to chromatic questions in $GW$ and $L$-theory.

Abstract

In this article we investigate the question of chromatic purity of L-theory. To do so, we utilize the theory of additive GW and L-theory in the language of Poincaré categories as laid out in the series of papers by Calmès et al. We apply this theory to chromatically localised L-theory at the prime $p=2$ and recover the L-theoretic analogues of chromatic purity for $E_1$-rings with involution. From this, we deduce that L-theory does not exhibit chromatic redshift. We deduce the higher chromatic vanishing of quadratic L-theory of arbitrary idempotent complete categories, thereby allowing the use of Hermitian trace methods to probe chromatic behaviour of GW and L-theory. Finally, we show that for $T(n+1)$-acyclic rings with involution, $T(n+1)$-local GW-theory depends only on $T(n+1)$-local K-theory and the associated duality, thereby proving a chromatic analogue of the homotopy limit problem for GW-theory.

Chromatic Purity in Hermitian K-Theory at $p=2$

TL;DR

This work analyzes chromatic behavior of L-theory at the prime by embedding additive Hermitian -theory into the framework of Poincaré categories. It proves a chromatic purity result: for an -ring with anti-involution , the maps to and to induce -local equivalences on quadratic -theory, implying no chromatic redshift and enabling higher chromatic vanishing results in idempotent complete Poincaré categories. The paper also develops descent/ fracture-square techniques for Hermitian -theory, deriving chromatic descent properties for -theory and establishing a chromatic analogue of the homotopy limit problem in this Hermitian setting. Leveraging additive -theory and trace methods, the results integrate with existing redshift and vanishing frameworks and set the stage for further applications of Hermitian trace methods to chromatic questions in and -theory.

Abstract

In this article we investigate the question of chromatic purity of L-theory. To do so, we utilize the theory of additive GW and L-theory in the language of Poincaré categories as laid out in the series of papers by Calmès et al. We apply this theory to chromatically localised L-theory at the prime and recover the L-theoretic analogues of chromatic purity for -rings with involution. From this, we deduce that L-theory does not exhibit chromatic redshift. We deduce the higher chromatic vanishing of quadratic L-theory of arbitrary idempotent complete categories, thereby allowing the use of Hermitian trace methods to probe chromatic behaviour of GW and L-theory. Finally, we show that for -acyclic rings with involution, -local GW-theory depends only on -local K-theory and the associated duality, thereby proving a chromatic analogue of the homotopy limit problem for GW-theory.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 36 theorems, 50 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 36 theorems, 50 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $(A,\sigma)$ be an $\mathbf{E}_1$-ring with anti-involution, and let $p=2$.

Theorems & Definitions (75)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Conjecture : Chromatic Redshift
  • Definition 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Example 1.4
  • Theorem A: Purity
  • Theorem B: No Redshift
  • Proposition 1.5
  • proof
  • Theorem C
  • ...and 65 more