Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Integrable deformations of principal chiral model from solutions of associative Yang-Baxter equation

D. Domanevsky, A. Levin, M. Olshanetsky, A. Zotov

TL;DR

The paper develops integrable deformations of the 1+1 principal chiral model and related Gaudin-type systems from solutions of the associative Yang-Baxter equation (AYBE) for ${ m GL}_N$. It builds a Lax framework via affine Higgs bundles, where the Lax operator $U(z)$ is constructed from AYBE-derived $r$- and $m$-matrices and residues $S^a$, ensuring a classical $r$-matrix structure and Zakharov-Shabat integrability. Two deformation channels are analyzed: (i) a twist function $k(z)$ acting as a cocentral charge that introduces additional poles and modifies the $r$-matrix data, and (ii) AYBE-based deformations that generate higher-rank Landau-Lifshitz, PCM, and Gaudin-type models with multi-point marked configurations. The work supplies explicit constructions for elliptic, trigonometric, and rational $R$-matrices, derives first and second flow equations for PCM and Gaudin models, and situates the formalism within the Hitchin/affine-Higgs bundle framework, including detailed appendices on the underlying geometric structure. These results unify ultralocal Lax descriptions with twist-induced deformations, expanding the toolkit for 2d integrable field theories and their finite-dimensional reductions.

Abstract

We describe deformations of the classical principle chiral model and 1+1 Gaudin model related to ${\rm GL}_N$ Lie group. The deformations are generated by $R$-matrices satisfying the associative Yang-Baxter equation. Using the coefficients of the expansion for these $R$-matrices we derive equations of motion based on a certain ansatz for $U$-$V$ pair satisfying the Zakharov-Shabat equation. Another deformation comes from the twist function, which we identify with the cocentral charge in the affine Higgs bundle underlying the Hitchin approach to 2d integrable models.

Integrable deformations of principal chiral model from solutions of associative Yang-Baxter equation

TL;DR

The paper develops integrable deformations of the 1+1 principal chiral model and related Gaudin-type systems from solutions of the associative Yang-Baxter equation (AYBE) for . It builds a Lax framework via affine Higgs bundles, where the Lax operator is constructed from AYBE-derived - and -matrices and residues , ensuring a classical -matrix structure and Zakharov-Shabat integrability. Two deformation channels are analyzed: (i) a twist function acting as a cocentral charge that introduces additional poles and modifies the -matrix data, and (ii) AYBE-based deformations that generate higher-rank Landau-Lifshitz, PCM, and Gaudin-type models with multi-point marked configurations. The work supplies explicit constructions for elliptic, trigonometric, and rational -matrices, derives first and second flow equations for PCM and Gaudin models, and situates the formalism within the Hitchin/affine-Higgs bundle framework, including detailed appendices on the underlying geometric structure. These results unify ultralocal Lax descriptions with twist-induced deformations, expanding the toolkit for 2d integrable field theories and their finite-dimensional reductions.

Abstract

We describe deformations of the classical principle chiral model and 1+1 Gaudin model related to Lie group. The deformations are generated by -matrices satisfying the associative Yang-Baxter equation. Using the coefficients of the expansion for these -matrices we derive equations of motion based on a certain ansatz for - pair satisfying the Zakharov-Shabat equation. Another deformation comes from the twist function, which we identify with the cocentral charge in the affine Higgs bundle underlying the Hitchin approach to 2d integrable models.
Paper Structure (44 sections, 7 theorems, 218 equations)

This paper contains 44 sections, 7 theorems, 218 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

The matrix $U(z)$ (q308) satisfies the classical $r$-matrix structure (q306).

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • Proposition 4.1
  • Theorem 4.1
  • Proposition 4.2
  • Theorem 4.2