Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On subgroup perfect codes in vertex-transitive graphs

Binzhou Xia, Junyang Zhang, Zhishuo Zhang

TL;DR

The paper develops a robust characterization of subgroup perfect codes in the context of vertex-transitive graphs by focusing on pairs $(G,H)$ with $H$ a perfect code of $G$. It proves equivalences that connect the existence of inverse-closed left transversals with commutation relations $XH=HX$ and isometric conditions within $A\{g,g^{-1}\}A$, yielding new corollaries and a nonexistence criterion. The authors use these tools to produce infinite counterexamples to a conjectured converse, demonstrating that the converse of a known sufficiency does not hold. They further initiate the study of perfect codes among maximal subgroups of $S_n$, giving complete results for intransitive subgroups and partial results for affine subgroups, supported by computational evidence for small $n$ and suggesting a broad prevalence of maximal subgroups that are perfect codes. Overall, the work bridges group-theoretic structure and graph-theoretic coding concepts, paving the way for a systematic classification of subgroup perfect codes in symmetric groups and related families.

Abstract

A subset $C$ of the vertex set $V$ of a graph $Γ$ is called a perfect code in $Γ$ if every vertex in $V\setminus C$ is adjacent to exactly one vertex in $C$. Given a group $G$ and a subgroup $H$ of $G$, a subgroup $A$ of $G$ containing $H$ is called a perfect code of the pair $(G,H)$ if there exists a coset graph $\mathrm{Cos}(G,H,U)$ such that the set of left cosets of $H$ in $A$ is a perfect code in $\mathrm{Cos}(G,H,U)$. In particular, $A$ is called a perfect code of $G$ if $A$ is a perfect code of the pair $(G,1)$. In this paper, we give a characterization of $A$ to be a perfect code of the pair $(G,H)$ under the assumption that $H$ is a perfect code of $G$. As a corollary, we derive an additional sufficient and necessary condition for $A$ to be a perfect code of $G$. Moreover, we establish conditions under which $A$ is not a perfect code of $(G,H)$, which is applied to construct infinitely many counterexamples to a question posed by Wang and Zhang [\emph{J.~Combin.~Theory~Ser.~A}, 196 (2023) 105737]. Furthermore, we initiate the study of determining which maximal subgroups of $S_n$ are perfect codes.

On subgroup perfect codes in vertex-transitive graphs

TL;DR

The paper develops a robust characterization of subgroup perfect codes in the context of vertex-transitive graphs by focusing on pairs with a perfect code of . It proves equivalences that connect the existence of inverse-closed left transversals with commutation relations and isometric conditions within , yielding new corollaries and a nonexistence criterion. The authors use these tools to produce infinite counterexamples to a conjectured converse, demonstrating that the converse of a known sufficiency does not hold. They further initiate the study of perfect codes among maximal subgroups of , giving complete results for intransitive subgroups and partial results for affine subgroups, supported by computational evidence for small and suggesting a broad prevalence of maximal subgroups that are perfect codes. Overall, the work bridges group-theoretic structure and graph-theoretic coding concepts, paving the way for a systematic classification of subgroup perfect codes in symmetric groups and related families.

Abstract

A subset of the vertex set of a graph is called a perfect code in if every vertex in is adjacent to exactly one vertex in . Given a group and a subgroup of , a subgroup of containing is called a perfect code of the pair if there exists a coset graph such that the set of left cosets of in is a perfect code in . In particular, is called a perfect code of if is a perfect code of the pair . In this paper, we give a characterization of to be a perfect code of the pair under the assumption that is a perfect code of . As a corollary, we derive an additional sufficient and necessary condition for to be a perfect code of . Moreover, we establish conditions under which is not a perfect code of , which is applied to construct infinitely many counterexamples to a question posed by Wang and Zhang [\emph{J.~Combin.~Theory~Ser.~A}, 196 (2023) 105737]. Furthermore, we initiate the study of determining which maximal subgroups of are perfect codes.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 15 theorems, 46 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 15 theorems, 46 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $G$ be a group and $A\leq G$. Then the following statements are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Theorem 1.1: CWX2020
  • Remark
  • Theorem 1.2: WZ2023
  • Theorem 1.3: WZ2023
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Corollary 1.6
  • Proposition 1.7
  • Proposition 1.8
  • proof : Proof of Theorem $\ref{['thm:pair']}$
  • proof : Proof of Proposition $\ref{['prop:closure']}$
  • ...and 16 more