Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Enriched $\infty$-categories as marked module categories

David Reutter, Markus Zetto

TL;DR

This work introduces a new, model-agnostic way to handle ∞-categories enriched in a presentably monoidal ∞-category $\eta V$ by encoding the enrichment data entirely in the enriched presheaf category together with a marking by representables. Central to the approach is the notion of marked modules, which makes the enrichment functorial in both the object-space and the enriching category, and enables a monadic reconstruction of enriched categories from presheaf data via a Barr–Beck–Lurie style theorem in presentable module categories. The paper proves a key equivalence: the category ${f vCat}_X(\mathcal V)$ of $\,\mathcal V$-enriched ∞-categories with object space $X$ embeds fully faithfully into the category of marked $\,\mathcal V$-modules, with the essential image consisting of those marked modules generated by atomic objects and subject to a suitable conservativity condition on Hom-spaces. It further develops univalence, flagged categories, and a tensor product of enriched categories, showing compatibility with colimits and establishing a robust monoidal framework that unifies several existing models (operadic, lax enrichment, and Day convolution). Overall, the marked-module perspective reduces enriched ∞-category theory to the higher algebra of presentable ∞-categories, clarifies functoriality, and provides a flexible, model-independent foundation with concrete applications to univalence and tensor products.

Abstract

We prove that an enriched $\infty$-category is completely determined by its enriched presheaf category together with a `marking' by the representable presheaves. More precisely, for any presentably monoidal $\infty$-category $\mathcal{V}$ we construct an equivalence between the category of $\mathcal{V}$-enriched $\infty$-categories and a certain full sub-category of the category of presentable $\mathcal{V}$-module categories equipped with a functor from an $\infty$-groupoid. This effectively allows us to reduce many aspects of enriched $\infty$-category theory to the theory of presentable $\infty$-categories. As applications, we use Lurie's tensor product of presentable $\infty$-categories to construct a tensor product of enriched $\infty$-categories with many desirable properties -- including compatibility with colimits and appropriate monoidality of presheaf functors -- and compare it to existing tensor products in the literature. We also re-examine and provide a model-independent reformulation of the notion of univalence (or Rezk-completeness) for enriched $\infty$-categories. Our comparison result relies on a monadicity theorem for presentable module categories which may be of independent interest.

Enriched $\infty$-categories as marked module categories

TL;DR

This work introduces a new, model-agnostic way to handle ∞-categories enriched in a presentably monoidal ∞-category by encoding the enrichment data entirely in the enriched presheaf category together with a marking by representables. Central to the approach is the notion of marked modules, which makes the enrichment functorial in both the object-space and the enriching category, and enables a monadic reconstruction of enriched categories from presheaf data via a Barr–Beck–Lurie style theorem in presentable module categories. The paper proves a key equivalence: the category of -enriched ∞-categories with object space embeds fully faithfully into the category of marked -modules, with the essential image consisting of those marked modules generated by atomic objects and subject to a suitable conservativity condition on Hom-spaces. It further develops univalence, flagged categories, and a tensor product of enriched categories, showing compatibility with colimits and establishing a robust monoidal framework that unifies several existing models (operadic, lax enrichment, and Day convolution). Overall, the marked-module perspective reduces enriched ∞-category theory to the higher algebra of presentable ∞-categories, clarifies functoriality, and provides a flexible, model-independent foundation with concrete applications to univalence and tensor products.

Abstract

We prove that an enriched -category is completely determined by its enriched presheaf category together with a `marking' by the representable presheaves. More precisely, for any presentably monoidal -category we construct an equivalence between the category of -enriched -categories and a certain full sub-category of the category of presentable -module categories equipped with a functor from an -groupoid. This effectively allows us to reduce many aspects of enriched -category theory to the theory of presentable -categories. As applications, we use Lurie's tensor product of presentable -categories to construct a tensor product of enriched -categories with many desirable properties -- including compatibility with colimits and appropriate monoidality of presheaf functors -- and compare it to existing tensor products in the literature. We also re-examine and provide a model-independent reformulation of the notion of univalence (or Rezk-completeness) for enriched -categories. Our comparison result relies on a monadicity theorem for presentable module categories which may be of independent interest.
Paper Structure (40 sections, 135 theorems, 179 equations)

This paper contains 40 sections, 135 theorems, 179 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For $X$ an $\infty$-groupoid and $\mathcal{V}$ a presentably monoidal $\infty$-category, the functor is fully faithful. Its essential image consists of those $(X\to \mathcal{M}) \in \operatorname{RMod}_{\mathcal{V}}(\operatorname{Pr})_{X/}$ for which the image of $X$ in $\mathcal{M}$ consists of $\mathcal{V}$-atomic objectsAn object $m\in \mathcal{M}$ in a presentable $\mathcal{V}$-module categor

Theorems & Definitions (322)

  • Definition : hinich
  • Theorem 1.1: \ref{['thm:charessim']}.
  • Theorem 1.2: \ref{['prop:coCart']} and \ref{['thm:functorialcomparison']}
  • Theorem 1.3: \ref{['cor:GHcomparison']}, \ref{['prop:univalization']}, and \ref{['thm:spacesenruniv']}
  • Theorem 1.4: Corollaries \ref{['cor:laxsymmetric']} and \ref{['cor:catpreservescolims']}
  • Corollary 1.5: Corollaries \ref{['constr:internaltensor']}, \ref{['cor:catVmonoidal']} and \ref{['cor:finalcomparisonGH']} and \ref{['thm:preservescolim']}
  • Theorem 1.6: Theorems \ref{['thm:monadicff']} and \ref{['thm:monadicity']}
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Example 2.4
  • ...and 312 more