Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Graphs with Independent Exact $r$-covers for all $r$

Hou Tin Chau

TL;DR

The paper resolves Gray and Johnson's question by constructing finite $d$-regular graphs that contain independent exact $r$-covers for all $r\in[1,d]$, using a two-step approach: build base graphs with a single independent exact $r$-cover and combine them via finite common coverings. It develops a robust framework of generalized graphs, covering maps, and a diagonal tensor-product construction to produce common coverings with controlled vertex counts, leveraging 1-/2-factor decompositions (Petersen's theorem) and Schreier-coset perspectives to optimize structure. The authors derive divisibility conditions on the graph order $n$ and determine exact minimal orders for $d=3,4,5,6$ (namely $40,210,6048,9240$ vertices) via explicit constructions from small base graphs and common coverings. They also provide asymptotic growth bounds for the minimal order $N(d)$ and discuss open cases (notably $d=7$) and potential extensions beyond pairwise cover intersections.

Abstract

For every natural number $d$, we construct finite $d$-regular simple graphs that, for every $r \le d$, contain an independent exact $r$-cover. This answers a question of Gray and Johnson that arose in their study of 2-step transit probabilities. We obtain some divisibility conditions on the order $n$ of graphs that for every $r \le d$ contain an independent exact $r$-cover, and give constructions for $d=3, 4, 5, 6$ where the order of the graph is minimal (we deduce this minimality from our divisibility conditions). We construct these graphs as common coverings of smaller graphs. We revisit a result of Angluin and Gardiner on finite common coverings of two regular graphs of the same degree, and the result of Gross that regular graphs of even degree are Schreier coset graphs. We combine both results to provide a finite common covering of two regular graphs of the same degree, that uses fewer vertices than the construction of Angluin and Gardiner in some cases.

Graphs with Independent Exact $r$-covers for all $r$

TL;DR

The paper resolves Gray and Johnson's question by constructing finite -regular graphs that contain independent exact -covers for all , using a two-step approach: build base graphs with a single independent exact -cover and combine them via finite common coverings. It develops a robust framework of generalized graphs, covering maps, and a diagonal tensor-product construction to produce common coverings with controlled vertex counts, leveraging 1-/2-factor decompositions (Petersen's theorem) and Schreier-coset perspectives to optimize structure. The authors derive divisibility conditions on the graph order and determine exact minimal orders for (namely vertices) via explicit constructions from small base graphs and common coverings. They also provide asymptotic growth bounds for the minimal order and discuss open cases (notably ) and potential extensions beyond pairwise cover intersections.

Abstract

For every natural number , we construct finite -regular simple graphs that, for every , contain an independent exact -cover. This answers a question of Gray and Johnson that arose in their study of 2-step transit probabilities. We obtain some divisibility conditions on the order of graphs that for every contain an independent exact -cover, and give constructions for where the order of the graph is minimal (we deduce this minimality from our divisibility conditions). We construct these graphs as common coverings of smaller graphs. We revisit a result of Angluin and Gardiner on finite common coverings of two regular graphs of the same degree, and the result of Gross that regular graphs of even degree are Schreier coset graphs. We combine both results to provide a finite common covering of two regular graphs of the same degree, that uses fewer vertices than the construction of Angluin and Gardiner in some cases.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 17 theorems, 24 equations, 3 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 4 sections, 17 theorems, 24 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.4

For each natural number $d$, there exists a finite $d$-regular simple graph $G$ with an independent exact $r$-cover $S_r \subset V(G)$ for all $r \in [d]$.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: (Case 1 in \ref{['lem:simple']}) A regular simple graph of degree $d=7$, where $\{7,8,9\}$ is an independent exact $3$-cover. A perfect matching is indicated in red.
  • Figure 2: (Case 2 in \ref{['lem:simple']}) A regular simple graph of degree $d=6$, where $\{6,7,8\}$ is an independent exact $3$-cover.
  • Figure 3: (Case 3 in \ref{['lem:simple']}) A regular graph of degree $d=7$ with semi-edges (dashed lines), where $\{7,8,9, 10\}$ is an independent exact $4$-cover. A 1-factor is indicated in red.

Theorems & Definitions (41)

  • Definition 1.1: 2-step transit probability, thequestion Section 1
  • Definition 1.2: Independent exact $r$-cover thequestion, p.7
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Definition 2.1: semiedge Definition 1
  • Definition 2.2: Generalized graph covering, semiedge Definition 4
  • Remark 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4: Image of an edge, semiedge Proposition 5 Items 5--7
  • Proposition 2.5: Preimage of an edge, semiedge Proposition 5 Items 5--7
  • Definition 2.6: Independent exact $r$-cover for generalized graph
  • Lemma 2.7
  • ...and 31 more