Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Normalized Solutions on large smooth domains to the Schrödinger equation with potential and general nonlinearity: Mass super-critical case

Xiaolu Lin, Zongyan Lv

TL;DR

The paper addresses the existence and multiplicity of normalized solutions to the mass-constrained NLS with a potential and mass-supercritical nonlinearity on large bounded domains and in $\mathbb{R}^N$. It overcomes the failure of Pohozaev-based normalization due to the potential by employing a monotonicity-trick–based variational framework and a mountain-pass geometry on mass-constrained manifolds $S_{r,c}$, obtaining solutions on large domains and passing to the whole space as the domain expands. A priori bounds, positivity of the Lagrange multiplier for small mass, and a concentration-compactness analysis yield normalized solutions in $\mathbb{R}^N$ for small $c$ with a clear decomposition into a core limit plus possible bubbles. The results extend the understanding of normalized solutions with nonconstant potentials in the mass-supercritical regime and provide asymptotic and bifurcation insights that complement recent work on related subcritical/supercritical mixtures.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the existence and multiplicity of prescribed mass solutions to the following nonlinear Schrödinger equation with general nonlinearity: Mass super-critical case: \[\begin{cases} -Δu+V(x)u+λu=g(u),\\ \|u\|_2^2=\int|u|^2\mathrm{d}x=c, \end{cases} \] both on large bounded smooth star-shaped domain $Ω\subset\mathbb{R}^N$ and on $\mathbb{R}^N$, where $V(x)$ is the potential and the nonlinearity $g(\cdot)$ considered here are very general and of mass super-critical. The standard approach based on the Pohozaev identity to obtain normalized solutions is invalid as the presence of potential $V(x)$. In addition, our study can be considered as a complement of Bartsch-Qi-Zou (Math Ann 390, 4813--4859, 2024), which has addressed an open problem raised in Bartsch et al. (Commun Partial Differ Equ 46(9):1729--1756, 2021).

Normalized Solutions on large smooth domains to the Schrödinger equation with potential and general nonlinearity: Mass super-critical case

TL;DR

The paper addresses the existence and multiplicity of normalized solutions to the mass-constrained NLS with a potential and mass-supercritical nonlinearity on large bounded domains and in . It overcomes the failure of Pohozaev-based normalization due to the potential by employing a monotonicity-trick–based variational framework and a mountain-pass geometry on mass-constrained manifolds , obtaining solutions on large domains and passing to the whole space as the domain expands. A priori bounds, positivity of the Lagrange multiplier for small mass, and a concentration-compactness analysis yield normalized solutions in for small with a clear decomposition into a core limit plus possible bubbles. The results extend the understanding of normalized solutions with nonconstant potentials in the mass-supercritical regime and provide asymptotic and bifurcation insights that complement recent work on related subcritical/supercritical mixtures.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the existence and multiplicity of prescribed mass solutions to the following nonlinear Schrödinger equation with general nonlinearity: Mass super-critical case: both on large bounded smooth star-shaped domain and on , where is the potential and the nonlinearity considered here are very general and of mass super-critical. The standard approach based on the Pohozaev identity to obtain normalized solutions is invalid as the presence of potential . In addition, our study can be considered as a complement of Bartsch-Qi-Zou (Math Ann 390, 4813--4859, 2024), which has addressed an open problem raised in Bartsch et al. (Commun Partial Differ Equ 46(9):1729--1756, 2021).
Paper Structure (4 sections, 10 theorems, 141 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 10 theorems, 141 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose that $(V_0)$ and $(G1)-(G3)$ hold, $V(x)\in C^1$ and $\tilde{V}$ is bounded. Then the following hold:

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • ...and 6 more