Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quasi-classical expansion of a hyperbolic solution to the star-star relation and multicomponent 5-point difference equations

Andrew P. Kels

TL;DR

This paper studies the quasi-classical expansion of a multicomponent ($n$-component) hyperbolic star-star solution in edge-interaction lattice models, using hyperbolic Boltzmann weights built from the hyperbolic gamma function. The authors scale variables with $\hbar$ and derive leading-order Lagrangian densities, yielding $n-1$ component 5-point difference equations that generalize known scalar equations on face-centered cubic lattices. In the hyperbolic and rational limits, these equations provide multicomponent extensions of scalar 5-point equations (e.g., $A3_{(1)}$ for $n=2$ and $A2_{(1;1)}$ in the rational $n=2$ case), with integrability conjectured to follow from consistency-around-a-face-centered-cube (CAFCC) and IRF Yang-Baxter structures. The work highlights a deep connection between integrable lattice models and discrete integrable systems, offering a pathway to analyze Lax pairs and CAFCC for $n>2$ and to explore multicomponent reductions and related hex systems. Overall, the paper extends the bridge between star-star integrable models and multicomponent discrete equations, enriching the landscape of discrete integrability.

Abstract

The quasi-classical expansion of a multicomponent spin solution of the star-star relation with hyperbolic Boltzmann weights is investigated. The equations obtained in a quasi-classical limit provide n-1-component extensions of certain scalar 5-point equations (corresponding to n=2) that were previously investigated by the author in the context of integrability and consistency of equations on face-centered cubics.

Quasi-classical expansion of a hyperbolic solution to the star-star relation and multicomponent 5-point difference equations

TL;DR

This paper studies the quasi-classical expansion of a multicomponent (-component) hyperbolic star-star solution in edge-interaction lattice models, using hyperbolic Boltzmann weights built from the hyperbolic gamma function. The authors scale variables with and derive leading-order Lagrangian densities, yielding component 5-point difference equations that generalize known scalar equations on face-centered cubic lattices. In the hyperbolic and rational limits, these equations provide multicomponent extensions of scalar 5-point equations (e.g., for and in the rational case), with integrability conjectured to follow from consistency-around-a-face-centered-cube (CAFCC) and IRF Yang-Baxter structures. The work highlights a deep connection between integrable lattice models and discrete integrable systems, offering a pathway to analyze Lax pairs and CAFCC for and to explore multicomponent reductions and related hex systems. Overall, the paper extends the bridge between star-star integrable models and multicomponent discrete equations, enriching the landscape of discrete integrability.

Abstract

The quasi-classical expansion of a multicomponent spin solution of the star-star relation with hyperbolic Boltzmann weights is investigated. The equations obtained in a quasi-classical limit provide n-1-component extensions of certain scalar 5-point equations (corresponding to n=2) that were previously investigated by the author in the context of integrability and consistency of equations on face-centered cubics.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 7 theorems, 96 equations, 8 figures)

This paper contains 15 sections, 7 theorems, 96 equations, 8 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

The following star-star relation holds

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Checkerboard square lattice and directed rapidity lines.
  • Figure 2: Four different types of edges belonging to the sets $E^{(1)}$, $E^{(2)}$, $E^{(3)}$, and $E^{(4)}$, respectively.
  • Figure 3: The two types of four-edge stars that appear in the checkerboard square lattice.
  • Figure 4: Star-star relation
  • Figure 5: A vertex configuration for \ref{['Adefhyp']}.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.3
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Remark 1
  • Proposition 3.4
  • proof
  • Remark 2
  • ...and 2 more