Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Countable models of weakly quasi-o-minimal theories I

Slavko Moconja, Predrag Tanović

TL;DR

The paper develops a framework for countable-model analysis in weakly quasi-o-minimal theories by introducing triviality and order-triviality for global invariant types and linking them to weakly o-minimal types. It introduces shifts in linearly ordered structures and proves that the existence of a definable shift forces the maximal number of countable models, $I(T,\aleph_0)=2^{\aleph_0}$. Key contributions include showing the equivalence of triviality notions for weakly o-minimal types, establishing stability of triviality under nonforking and weak nonorthogonality, and using semiintervals and shifts to derive model-count results. The results provide a broad mechanism to diagnose when a weakly quasi-o-minimal theory has many countable models, advancing Vaught's conjecture in this tame setting. The paper also offers detailed constructions and examples to illustrate the phenomena across o-minimal, weakly o-minimal, and almost weakly o-minimal theories.

Abstract

We introduce the notions of triviality and order-triviality for global invariant types in an arbitrary first-order theory and show that they are well behaved in the NIP context. We show that these two notions agree for invariant global extensions of a weakly o-minimal type, in which case we say that the type is trivial. In the o-minimal case, we prove that every definable complete 1-type over a model is trivial. We prove that the triviality has several favorable properties; in particular, it is preserved in nonforking extensions of a weakly o-minimal type and under weak nonorthogonality of weakly o-minimal types. We introduce the notion of a shift in a linearly ordered structure that generalizes the successor function. Then we apply the techniques developed to prove that every weakly quasi-o-minimal theory that admits a definable shift has $2^{\aleph_0}$ countable models.

Countable models of weakly quasi-o-minimal theories I

TL;DR

The paper develops a framework for countable-model analysis in weakly quasi-o-minimal theories by introducing triviality and order-triviality for global invariant types and linking them to weakly o-minimal types. It introduces shifts in linearly ordered structures and proves that the existence of a definable shift forces the maximal number of countable models, . Key contributions include showing the equivalence of triviality notions for weakly o-minimal types, establishing stability of triviality under nonforking and weak nonorthogonality, and using semiintervals and shifts to derive model-count results. The results provide a broad mechanism to diagnose when a weakly quasi-o-minimal theory has many countable models, advancing Vaught's conjecture in this tame setting. The paper also offers detailed constructions and examples to illustrate the phenomena across o-minimal, weakly o-minimal, and almost weakly o-minimal theories.

Abstract

We introduce the notions of triviality and order-triviality for global invariant types in an arbitrary first-order theory and show that they are well behaved in the NIP context. We show that these two notions agree for invariant global extensions of a weakly o-minimal type, in which case we say that the type is trivial. In the o-minimal case, we prove that every definable complete 1-type over a model is trivial. We prove that the triviality has several favorable properties; in particular, it is preserved in nonforking extensions of a weakly o-minimal type and under weak nonorthogonality of weakly o-minimal types. We introduce the notion of a shift in a linearly ordered structure that generalizes the successor function. Then we apply the techniques developed to prove that every weakly quasi-o-minimal theory that admits a definable shift has countable models.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 49 theorems, 20 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 49 theorems, 20 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

If a weakly quasi-o-minimal theory has a definable shift on $(\mathop{\mathrm{\mathfrak C}}\nolimits,<)$, then $I(T,\aleph_0)=2^{\aleph_0}$.

Theorems & Definitions (131)

  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • Remark 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Theorem 2.8: MTwom
  • proof
  • ...and 121 more