Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Harish-Chandra's admissibility theorem and beyond

Toshiyuki Kobayashi

TL;DR

The article surveys Harish-Chandra's admissibility for restricting representations to maximal compact subgroups and extends these ideas to non-compact subgroups. It develops two general frameworks—$G'$-admissible restriction (discrete, finite multiplicity) and finite/uniform multiplicity properties—to study branching beyond Riemannian settings, with a focus on real spherical spaces and complexifications. The work provides classification criteria, examples, and methods (D-modules, visible actions) that connect branching laws to spectral theory on standard locally homogeneous spaces, including pseudo-Riemannian locally symmetric spaces. It culminates in a geometry-driven approach to spectral analysis on quotients $\Gamma\backslash G/H$, establishing discretely decomposable restrictions with uniformly bounded multiplicities and a subrepresentation-theoretic backbone for understanding the spectrum in non-classical contexts.

Abstract

This article is a record of the lecture at the centennial conference for Harish-Chandra. The admissibility theorem of Harish-Chandra concerns the restrictions of irreducible representations to maximal compact subgroups. In this article, we begin with a brief explanation of two directions for generalizing his pioneering work to {\it{non-compact}} reductive subgroups: one emphasizes discrete decomposability with the finite multiplicity property, while the other focuses on finite/uniformly bounded multiplicity properties. We discuss how the recent representation-theoretic developments in these directions collectively offer a powerful method for the new spectral analysis of standard locally symmetric spaces, extending beyond the classical Riemannian setting.

Harish-Chandra's admissibility theorem and beyond

TL;DR

The article surveys Harish-Chandra's admissibility for restricting representations to maximal compact subgroups and extends these ideas to non-compact subgroups. It develops two general frameworks—-admissible restriction (discrete, finite multiplicity) and finite/uniform multiplicity properties—to study branching beyond Riemannian settings, with a focus on real spherical spaces and complexifications. The work provides classification criteria, examples, and methods (D-modules, visible actions) that connect branching laws to spectral theory on standard locally homogeneous spaces, including pseudo-Riemannian locally symmetric spaces. It culminates in a geometry-driven approach to spectral analysis on quotients , establishing discretely decomposable restrictions with uniformly bounded multiplicities and a subrepresentation-theoretic backbone for understanding the spectrum in non-classical contexts.

Abstract

This article is a record of the lecture at the centennial conference for Harish-Chandra. The admissibility theorem of Harish-Chandra concerns the restrictions of irreducible representations to maximal compact subgroups. In this article, we begin with a brief explanation of two directions for generalizing his pioneering work to {\it{non-compact}} reductive subgroups: one emphasizes discrete decomposability with the finite multiplicity property, while the other focuses on finite/uniformly bounded multiplicity properties. We discuss how the recent representation-theoretic developments in these directions collectively offer a powerful method for the new spectral analysis of standard locally symmetric spaces, extending beyond the classical Riemannian setting.
Paper Structure (38 sections, 15 theorems, 39 equations)

This paper contains 38 sections, 15 theorems, 39 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For any irreducible unitary representation $\Pi$ of $G$, one has the following finite-multiplicity property: Here $[\Pi|_K: \pi]$ denotes the multiplicity of the representation $\pi$ occurring in the restriction of $\Pi$ to $K$.

Theorems & Definitions (44)

  • Theorem 1.1: Harish-Chandra's admissibility theorem
  • Definition 1.2
  • Example 1.3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3: Criterion for $K'$-admissibility
  • Corollary 2.4: Criterion for admissible restriction
  • Remark 2.5
  • Example 2.6: Theta correspondence
  • Example 2.7
  • ...and 34 more