Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On n-dependent groups and fields III. Multilinear forms and invariant connected components

Artem Chernikov, Nadja Hempel

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive model-theoretic treatment of multilinear forms, proving quantifier elimination for infinite-dimensional alternating non-degenerate $n$-linear spaces over NIP fields and establishing their $n$-dependence (strictly so in the generic case). It generalizes Granger’s bilinear results via a higher-arity Composition Lemma, combining finitary type-counting and array-shattering techniques to show that compositions preserve $n$-dependence. The paper also demonstrates NSOP$_1$ preservation in multilinear form theories and investigates invariant connected components $G^{ abla}$ in $n$-dependent abelian groups, obtaining a relative absoluteness result and applying it to finite-field multilinear form examples. These findings illuminate the tame behavior of multilinear-structured theories, connect $n$-dependence to stability-theoretic properties, and provide concrete structural descriptions of connected components in group settings.

Abstract

We develop some model theory of multi-linear forms, generalizing Granger in the bi-linear case. In particular, after proving a quantifier elimination result, we show that for an NIP field K, the theory of infinite dimensional non-degenerate alternating n-linear spaces over K is strictly n-dependent; and it is NSOP1 if K is. This relies on a new Composition Lemma for functions of arbitrary arity and NIP relations (which in turn relies on certain higher arity generalizations of Sauer-Shelah lemma). We also study the invariant connected components $G^{\infty}$ in n-dependent groups, demonstrating their relative absoluteness in the abelian case.

On n-dependent groups and fields III. Multilinear forms and invariant connected components

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive model-theoretic treatment of multilinear forms, proving quantifier elimination for infinite-dimensional alternating non-degenerate -linear spaces over NIP fields and establishing their -dependence (strictly so in the generic case). It generalizes Granger’s bilinear results via a higher-arity Composition Lemma, combining finitary type-counting and array-shattering techniques to show that compositions preserve -dependence. The paper also demonstrates NSOP preservation in multilinear form theories and investigates invariant connected components in -dependent abelian groups, obtaining a relative absoluteness result and applying it to finite-field multilinear form examples. These findings illuminate the tame behavior of multilinear-structured theories, connect -dependence to stability-theoretic properties, and provide concrete structural descriptions of connected components in group settings.

Abstract

We develop some model theory of multi-linear forms, generalizing Granger in the bi-linear case. In particular, after proving a quantifier elimination result, we show that for an NIP field K, the theory of infinite dimensional non-degenerate alternating n-linear spaces over K is strictly n-dependent; and it is NSOP1 if K is. This relies on a new Composition Lemma for functions of arbitrary arity and NIP relations (which in turn relies on certain higher arity generalizations of Sauer-Shelah lemma). We also study the invariant connected components in n-dependent groups, demonstrating their relative absoluteness in the abelian case.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 35 theorems, 177 equations)

This paper contains 22 sections, 35 theorems, 177 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

For any $n \geq 1$ and field $K$, the theory $\prescript{}{\operatorname{Alt}}T^K_n$ of infinite dimensional alternating non-degenerate $n$-linear spaces over $K$ has quantifier elimination in the language $\mathcal{L}^{K}_{\theta,f}$, and is complete. If $K$ is finite, then $\prescript{}{\operatorn

Theorems & Definitions (111)

  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['thm: QE for multilinear forms']}
  • Theorem : Composition Lemma, Theorem \ref{['Composition Lemma']}
  • Theorem : see Proposition \ref{['prop: type count']} for a precise statement
  • Theorem : Array Shattering Lemma, Lemma \ref{['lem: comp lemma induction']}(2) for $k=2$
  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['thm: Granger']}
  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['thm: NSOP1 and Kim indep']}
  • Conjecture 1.2
  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['thm: Ginfty k-dep main']}
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • ...and 101 more