Table of Contents
Fetching ...

High-Accuracy and Efficient DV-Hop Localization for IoT Using Hop Loss

Zhengdi Shen, Qiran Wang

TL;DR

This work tackles IoT localization by reformulating DV-Hop with a novel hop-loss model called distance-based connectivity consistency ($HL^{DCC}$). It introduces an activation condition based on connectivity consistency $AC^{CC}$ and a continuous distance-based individual loss $IL^{DST}$, combining them into $HL^{DCC}$ to avoid expensive predicted hop-count calculations while ensuring full coverage of hop errors. The approach yields higher localization accuracy and significant reductions in computation time (about 30–40% over a hop-loss baseline) across multiple network topologies, with ablation showing the necessity of both components. Overall, DCC enhances DV-Hop performance for large-scale IoT localization, offering practical benefits for real-time and scalable deployments.

Abstract

Accurate localization is critical for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Using hop loss in DV-Hop-based algorithms is a promising approach. Nevertheless, challenges lie in overcoming the computational complexity caused by re-calculating the predicted hop-counts, and how to further optimize the modeling for better accuracy. In this paper, a novel hop loss modeling, distance-based connectivity consistency (DCC), is proposed. By focusing on the first order connectivity, DCC avoids computing predicted hop-counts, and significantly reduces the time complexity. We also provide a proof to theoretically guarantee that this design achieves a full coverage of all hop errors. In addition, by computing a continuous loss function instead of the discrete hop-count errors, DCC further improves the localization accuracy. In the evaluations, DCC demonstrates notable improvements in accuracy over other highly regarded algorithms, and reduces 30% to 40% total computation time compared with the baseline algorithm using hop loss.

High-Accuracy and Efficient DV-Hop Localization for IoT Using Hop Loss

TL;DR

This work tackles IoT localization by reformulating DV-Hop with a novel hop-loss model called distance-based connectivity consistency (). It introduces an activation condition based on connectivity consistency and a continuous distance-based individual loss , combining them into to avoid expensive predicted hop-count calculations while ensuring full coverage of hop errors. The approach yields higher localization accuracy and significant reductions in computation time (about 30–40% over a hop-loss baseline) across multiple network topologies, with ablation showing the necessity of both components. Overall, DCC enhances DV-Hop performance for large-scale IoT localization, offering practical benefits for real-time and scalable deployments.

Abstract

Accurate localization is critical for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Using hop loss in DV-Hop-based algorithms is a promising approach. Nevertheless, challenges lie in overcoming the computational complexity caused by re-calculating the predicted hop-counts, and how to further optimize the modeling for better accuracy. In this paper, a novel hop loss modeling, distance-based connectivity consistency (DCC), is proposed. By focusing on the first order connectivity, DCC avoids computing predicted hop-counts, and significantly reduces the time complexity. We also provide a proof to theoretically guarantee that this design achieves a full coverage of all hop errors. In addition, by computing a continuous loss function instead of the discrete hop-count errors, DCC further improves the localization accuracy. In the evaluations, DCC demonstrates notable improvements in accuracy over other highly regarded algorithms, and reduces 30% to 40% total computation time compared with the baseline algorithm using hop loss.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 1 theorem, 14 equations, 7 figures, 8 tables)

This paper contains 14 sections, 1 theorem, 14 equations, 7 figures, 8 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

If there are two nodes $i, j$ in a network making $Hop^{real}_{i,j} \neq Hop^{pred}_{i,j}$, then there exist $i', j'$ in the network making $AC^{CC}_{i', j'}=1$.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: An example of the DV-Hop localization. A node has a communication radius $R$, and can directly communicate with other nodes within the communication radius. The hop-count between two directly connected nodes is 1, and the hop-counts between other nodes can be derived by information propagation.
  • Figure 2: An example network with a hop-count inconsistency between $Hop^{real}_{1,4}$ and $Hop^{pred}_{1,4}$. Each dot represents a node, and each segment between nodes represents the nodes are connected. $HL^{base}$ cannot catch this hop error because $AC^{base}_{1,4}=0$. On the other hand, $AC^{CC}_{1,4}=1$, making the modified hop loss capable of catching the error.
  • Figure 3: The relation between $IL_{i,j}^{DST}$ and $Dist_{i,j}^{pred}$ in the two conditions.
  • Figure 4: The types of the network topology in simulations: randomly distributed, C-shaped, O-shaped and X-shaped. Each blue dot $\bullet$ represents an unknown node, and each red dot $\bullet$ represents an anchor nodes.
  • Figure 5: The $95\%$ confidence interval of $MLEs$. ${N}_{a}=20$, $R=25$.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Proposition 1
  • proof